Company Directory - Boyden Gray PLLC
Company Details - Boyden Gray PLLC

Boyden Gray PLLC
WebsiteUnited States
A law firm specializing in regulatory compliance and public policy, primarily focusing on economic and labor regulations, providing strategic legal services to clients navigating complex regulatory environments.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Boyden Gray PLLC
-51.80
0.03%
Latest Event
Co-Counsel in Lawsuit Challenging Progressive ESG/DEI Disclosures
Boyden Gray PLLC acted as co-counsel alongside America First Legal in a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Target Corporation. The lawsuit challenged Target’s risk disclosures related to its 2023 LGBT Pride Month campaign and broader ESG/DEI initiatives, a move that critics argue seeks to undermine progressive corporate policies.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Boyden Gray PLLC is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- DEC042024
Boyden Gray PLLC acted as co-counsel alongside America First Legal in a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Target Corporation. The lawsuit challenged Target’s risk disclosures related to its 2023 LGBT Pride Month campaign and broader ESG/DEI initiatives, a move that critics argue seeks to undermine progressive corporate policies.
-60
Executive Political Engagement
April 2
Boyden Gray PLLC's participation as co-counsel in a politically charged lawsuit, which challenges progressive initiatives like ESG, DEI, and inclusive marketing campaigns, reflects a stance that aligns with conservative legal strategies. From an anti-authoritarian, progressive perspective, such involvement promotes a backlash against efforts that aim to advance equity and inclusivity in corporate policy, thereby earning a negative rating under Executive Political Engagement.
- AUG012024
In August 2024, Boyden Gray PLLC, in partnership with America First Legal, filed a securities lawsuit against Target Corporation. The suit alleges that misleading claims regarding Target's ESG and DEI initiatives caused significant financial losses for shareholders.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
By targeting corporate claims related to ESG and DEI, the firm seeks to undermine accountability and transparency regarding socially responsible practices. This legal action not only challenges efforts to ensure corporate accountability but also risks discouraging initiatives meant to protect marginalized stakeholders.
- JUL012024
In July 2024, Boyden Gray PLLC submitted an amicus brief in the landmark Students for Fair Admissions case. The brief played a role in challenging race-based affirmative action policies in higher education.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
The firm’s participation in litigation aimed at curtailing race-conscious admissions policies reflects a broader agenda against affirmative action and diversity initiatives, thereby hindering efforts to promote equity and protect marginalized communities in higher education.
- MAY012024
In May 2024, Boyden Gray PLLC represented Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment in a case where the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California ruled that AB 979 – a law mandating racial diversity quotas on corporate boards – violated constitutional rights and the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
Successfully challenging racial diversity quotas undermines efforts to promote representation and equity. Such litigation directly opposes initiatives aimed at protecting marginalized groups and fostering systemic inclusion.
- MAR012024
In March 2024, Boyden Gray PLLC achieved a legal victory when the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld their nationwide injunction against President Biden’s vaccine mandate for federal employees – the only successful suit of its kind. This legal action removed a public health safeguard that protected workers and vulnerable communities.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
By litigating to overturn a vaccine mandate, the firm actively undermined policies designed to protect public health and workers’ safety. Such actions can be interpreted as supporting an agenda that sidelines marginalized groups, negatively impacting community well-being.
- JAN032024
Throughout 2023, Boyden Gray PLLC has significantly influenced public discourse by making hundreds of media appearances. The firm’s opinions have been featured in outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, Daily Wire, Washington Examiner, and National Review, among others.
-80
Media Influence and Propaganda
April 2
Frequent appearances on media platforms known for right-wing and authoritarian-leaning content indicate that the firm is actively shaping public opinion in ways that reinforce divisive, anti-progressive narratives. Such influence can contribute to undermining initiatives aimed at supporting marginalized communities.
- AUG082023
Boyden Gray PLLC, alongside America First Legal and Lawson Huck Gonzalez, filed a lawsuit against Target Corporation alleging that the company misled investors by promoting aggressive ESG and DEI mandates. The suit criticizes Target for focusing on left-wing stakeholder concerns rather than rigorous oversight of business risks, and follows the firm's earlier legal victory that struck down mandated board diversity practices.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 2
This legal action by Boyden Gray PLLC is explicitly aimed at undermining progressive initiatives such as ESG and DEI mandates. By challenging what they label as 'reckless' policies, the firm is opposing measures that protect marginalized communities and promote diverse representation, thereby exhibiting behavior that aligns with anti-progressive, authoritarian tendencies.
- JUL132023
On July 13, 2023, Jonathan Berry, managing partner of Boyden Gray PLLC, testified before a congressional committee regarding reforms to the SEC’s proxy process. In his detailed written statement, Berry argued that the current framework disproportionately favors ESG-driven shareholder proposals—advancing progressive and activist agendas—while sidelining conservative or non-ESG proposals. Berry, who also noted his past role in the Trump Administration as Acting Assistant Secretary for Policy at the U.S. Department of Labor, called for changes that would restrict what he viewed as politically motivated interventions in corporate governance. From a left-leaning anti-fascist perspective, this testimony can be seen as an effort to undermine progressive corporate accountability measures designed to protect marginalized communities and worker rights.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 2
The testimony by Jonathan Berry constitutes a clear instance of executive political engagement where he leverages his past government role and his current position to push a conservative agenda. By criticizing the SEC’s proxy process for favoring ESG and progressive proposals, his arguments undermine efforts to ensure corporate accountability and representation of marginalized interests. This engagement aligns with political practices that from a left-leaning perspective, contribute to curtailing progressive reforms.
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 2
Berry’s call to reform the proxy process by excluding shareholder proposals that address social, environmental, and governance issues undermines the role of corporations in promoting accountability and protecting marginalized communities. This legal strategy, framed as safeguarding investor interests, detracts from corporate responsibilities towards social justice and worker rights.
- JAN012023
In 2023, Boyden Gray PLLC, a law firm specializing in regulatory compliance and public policy, was recorded as engaging in lobbying activities with a total reported spending of $120,000 for a single client, as documented by OpenSecrets.
-20
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 2
The firm's recorded lobbying expenditure, though modest in amount, reflects participation in the political influence arena. Lobbying activities can potentially steer regulatory policies in favor of narrow interests, thereby undermining democratic processes. From an anti-fascist perspective, any activity that channels influence to private interests over public welfare is concerning.
Alternatives
United States
80.00

Oakland, United States
74.74

Chicago, United States
72.38

Chicago, United States
68.19

Washington, D.C., United States
67.02
Washington, United States
64.73

Seattle, United States
51.09

Washington, D.C., United States
40.22

Boston, United States
31.79

San Francisco, United States
22.81
Industries
- 541110
- Offices of Lawyers
- 541199
- All Other Legal Services