Company Directory - Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Company Details - Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
WebsiteMcLean, United States
Booz Allen Hamilton is a management and technology consulting firm that helps organizations boost performance and achieve results by delivering innovative consulting services in analytics, digital solutions, engineering, advisory, and cyber operations.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-58.61
0.04%
Latest Event
Booz Allen Withdraws WorldPride Sponsorship Amid Trump DEI Pressure
Booz Allen Hamilton, historically a supporter of LGBTQ+ causes, abruptly canceled its sponsorship of WorldPride 2025 and ended its DEI programs citing concerns over potential backlash from the Trump administration's anti-DEI policies, signaling a retreat from its established support of marginalized communities.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- FEB142025
Booz Allen Hamilton, historically a supporter of LGBTQ+ causes, abruptly canceled its sponsorship of WorldPride 2025 and ended its DEI programs citing concerns over potential backlash from the Trump administration's anti-DEI policies, signaling a retreat from its established support of marginalized communities.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 28
Booz Allen Hamilton’s decision to pull out as a sponsor of WorldPride—and its broader rollback of DEI initiatives—reflects a politically motivated shift designed to appease federal contracting pressures under Trump’s anti-DEI edicts. This move undermines its longstanding public support for LGBTQ+ communities and aligns the firm with authoritarian pressures, negatively impacting its political behavior rating.
-40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 28
By canceling its sponsorship for WorldPride 2025 and eliminating DEI programs from its communications and strategic priorities, Booz Allen Hamilton demonstrates a retreat from ethical business practices that had long supported marginalized groups. This decision shows prioritization of business interests over genuine commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
- JUL212023
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation agreed to pay $377,453,150 to resolve allegations of improperly billing its government contracts by misallocating costs from commercial and international operations, highlighting significant ethical lapses in its business practices.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 28
The settlement exposes a violation of ethical business practices. Booz Allen Hamilton was accused of misallocating costs—charging government contracts for expenses unrelated to governmental work—which not only defrauds taxpayers but also undermines accountability and transparency in corporate behavior. This action reflects negatively on the firm's commitment to ethical standards in its operations.
Booz Allen Agrees to Pay $377.45 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
- JUL212023
Booz Allen Hamilton reached a settlement agreement with the United States Department of Justice over allegations that between 2011 and 2021, the firm submitted false claims by misallocating indirect costs on government contracts, resulting in a $377 million settlement that includes restitution and accrued interest.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 28
The settlement agreement reveals unethical business practices where Booz Allen Hamilton misallocated indirect costs and submitted false claims under the False Claims Act. Such actions undermine accountability in government contracting and expose public funds to misuse, reflecting negatively on the firm’s ethical business practices.
PDF A9ciwbp5 sjmaca bro - United States Department of Justice
-60
Economic and Structural Influence
March 28
The misconduct that led to the settlement not only reflects poor business ethics but also demonstrates a systemic issue in how corporate financial practices can structurally influence government spending and contracting. The misallocation of costs has broader implications for economic accountability and integrity in government dealings.
PDF A9ciwbp5 sjmaca bro - United States Department of Justice
- JUL152023
A whistleblower revealed that Booz Allen Hamilton systematically overbilled U.S. government defense and national security contracts over a span of years, effectively subsidizing its consulting work for foreign governments. The controversy culminated in a historic $377 million settlement, with concerns raised that lax government oversight enabled prolonged fraudulent practices.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 28
Booz Allen Hamilton's deliberate practice of overbilling the U.S. government not only defrauded taxpayer funds but also indirectly financed its international consulting engagements, including work for the Saudi government. This behavior demonstrates a flagrant violation of ethical business practices and accountability standards.
Whistleblower to DOJ: You've left the door open for more fraud
-60
Economic and Structural Influence
March 28
The overbilling practice effectively provided an interest‐free flow of funds that allowed Booz Allen Hamilton to subsidize its work for foreign clients, undermining structural accountability in government contracting and raising serious concerns about economic influence and regulatory oversight.
Whistleblower to DOJ: You've left the door open for more fraud
- JAN012023
Booz Allen Hamilton agreed to settle a False Claims Act lawsuit by paying $377.5 million over allegations that it improperly shifted costs to government contracts, thereby subsidizing its private operations and misusing taxpayer funds.
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 28
Booz Allen Hamilton's settlement over allegations of mischarging government contracts reflects unethical business practices by misallocating costs and potentially defrauding taxpayers. This conduct undermines corporate ethical responsibility and trust in public contracting.
Consulting Firm to Pay $377.5M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
-60
Economic and Structural Influence
March 28
The allegations point to broader economic and structural concerns by undermining the integrity of government contracting, where improper cost shifting can distort market practices and taxpayer allocations, reflecting a negative economic influence.
Consulting Firm to Pay $377.5M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
Alternatives
New York, United States
41.16
Armonk, United States
7.77
Corporation
0.00
Corporation
0.00
Corporation
-20.82
Dublin, Ireland
-1.14
Corporation
-46.79
San Francisco, United States
62.75
Scottsdale, United States
27.46
Denver, United States
-52.12
Industries
- 541512
- Computer Systems Design Services
- 541519
- Other Computer Related Services
- 541611
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- 541690
- Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
- 611430
- Professional and Management Development Training