Company Directory - Anglo-Persian Oil Company
Company Details - Anglo-Persian Oil Company

Anglo-Persian Oil Company
The Anglo-Persian Oil Company, later known as British Petroleum (BP), was an oil company that played a significant role in the oil industry in Iran. It was established to exploit the oil resources of Persia and became one of the largest oil companies in the world, crucially influencing the global energy market.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Anglo-Persian Oil Company
-40.88
-2.39%
Latest Event
Legal Action Over Toxic Emissions at BP-run Rumaila Field
Iraqi father Hussein Julood has initiated legal proceedings against BP, alleging that the practice of gas flaring at the Rumaila oil field led to toxic emissions causing his son's leukemia and subsequent death. The case raises concerns over BP's environmental and community health practices in a region already vulnerable to corporate environmental negligence.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Anglo-Persian Oil Company is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- APR232024
Iraqi father Hussein Julood has initiated legal proceedings against BP, alleging that the practice of gas flaring at the Rumaila oil field led to toxic emissions causing his son's leukemia and subsequent death. The case raises concerns over BP's environmental and community health practices in a region already vulnerable to corporate environmental negligence.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
June 25
The legal action highlights allegations that BP's gas flaring practice, which releases toxic carcinogens, has directly impacted local community health. This incident reflects a severe lapse in ethical business practices and a disregard for environmental justice, disproportionately affecting marginalized populations. Such corporate behavior is indicative of broader patterns of neglect and irresponsibility in operational practices.
UK: Iraqi father launches legal action against BP over son's death
- APR222024
BP plc is facing legal action after an Iraqi national sent a Letter Before Action on April 22, 2024, alleging that excessive gas flaring at the Rumaila oil field caused toxic emissions leading to the cancer and subsequent death of his son. The lawsuit highlights BP's failure to reduce harmful emissions despite its public claims of environmental responsibility.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
June 25
BP’s public communications and image makeover—including a green logo intended to signify environmental commitment—are starkly contradicted by its continued, excessive gas flaring practices near communities. This discrepancy undermines trust and reflects a failure of responsible public and political behavior.
BP hit by legal action alleging that its excessive gas flaring caused death of young Iraqi
-80
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
June 25
BP's operational practices, evidenced by continued gas flaring in close proximity to residential areas in violation of Iraqi law, have led to severe environmental harm and human health issues. The legal action underscores the company's unethical business practices and disregard for community well-being.
BP hit by legal action alleging that its excessive gas flaring caused death of young Iraqi
- FEB282024
BP has come under fire by the coalition 'No Business With Genocide' for its nearly $84 billion investment in Azerbaijan, which critics say has financially underwritten President Ilham Aliyev’s autocratic regime and its alleged ethnic cleansing of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh. The company’s conspicuous silence on these human rights abuses has intensified concerns over its complicity in enabling such atrocities.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
June 25
BP’s lack of public accountability and its silence in the face of allegations regarding ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh reflects a negative stance in terms of public and political behavior, undermining expectations for corporate responsibility in human rights issues.
British Petroleum under scrutiny for enabling ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh
-80
Economic Collaboration
June 25
BP’s extensive investment in Azerbaijan is seen as a form of economic collaboration that indirectly supports an authoritarian regime. By financially enabling the Azerbaijani government, BP is implicated in the facilitation of policies leading to ethnic cleansing, marking a serious ethical breach.
British Petroleum under scrutiny for enabling ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh
- OCT012023
BP remains in troubled waters over an oil spill incident, with a potential settlement with the DOJ and SEC that excludes environmental penalties, leaving the company open to fines up to $5.4 billion. This situation raises concerns about BP's business practices and its responsibility towards environmental safety and community welfare.
-70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
June 25
This event highlights BP's potentially negligent business practices reflected in its handling of the oil spill. The exclusion of environmental penalties from the DOJ and SEC settlement suggests a failure to fully account for environmental and community impacts, undermining ethical responsibility.
- JUL192023
The article reveals how BP’s profit-driven strategies have influenced UK foreign policy to favor wars, coups, and dictatorial regimes worldwide. It highlights how BP’s interests have led governments in the UK and US to support authoritarian rulers—from the 1953 coup in Iran to interventions in Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and beyond—demonstrating a pattern of using economic clout and political influence to bolster repressive regimes while sidelining democratic values and human rights.
-95
Public and Political Behavior
June 25
BP has repeatedly been implicated in shaping government actions to support authoritarian regimes and coups, most notably the 1953 Iranian coup and other interventions in oil‐rich regions. This demonstrates a pattern of aligning public policy with profit motives at the expense of democracy and human rights.
How BP's interests drive UK support for wars, coups and dictators
-85
Economic and Structural Influence
June 25
BP’s economic clout has been leveraged to secure lucrative oil deals and support regimes that ensure steady profits, even if it means backing repressive governments. The company's structural influence within global energy markets has driven conflicts and coups, directly linking its business practices to the reinforcement of authoritarian rule.
How BP's interests drive UK support for wars, coups and dictators
- AUG191953
The article recounts historical events in which the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, later BP, controlled Iran's oil industry. This control contributed to foreign interference and exploitative practices that fueled political instability and authoritarian regimes, culminating in the nationalisation movement of the oil industry in 1953.
- AUG191953
In 1953, the Anglo-Persian Oil Company—later known as British Petroleum—played a direct role in undermining Iranian democracy. The company provided financial backing for covert operations, including bribery and economic measures, that facilitated the overthrow of Prime Minister Mossadegh. This support helped install an authoritarian regime aligned with Western colonial interests, significantly contributing to Iran’s long history of exploitation and loss of sovereignty.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
June 25
The company’s funding of covert operations and bribery in support of the 1953 coup demonstrates clear political complicity. By financially enabling the overthrow of a democratically elected government, APOC directly contributed to anti-democratic, authoritarian practices that have left a lasting legacy of exploitation in Iran.
How Iran's geopolitical fate and regimes in the last century ...
-70
Economic Collaboration
June 25
By financially backing the coup and aligning with colonial-era strategies, the company engaged in economic collaboration that prioritized Western control over Iranian resources at the severe expense of the country’s political sovereignty and social welfare.
How Iran's geopolitical fate and regimes in the last century ...
- AUG011953
The article recounts BP's origins as the Anglo-Persian Oil Company and its involvement in the political crisis of 1953 in Iran. It details how the company, under British direction, contributed to the overthrow of Prime Minister Mossadegh by facilitating covert operations, which ultimately paved the way for authoritarian rule in Iran.
-85
Public and Political Behavior
June 25
The company's early strategy, orchestrated by its founders and in alignment with British governmental interests, involved practices that undermined Iranian sovereignty and democratic governance. Its role in facilitating and supporting covert actions that led to the removal of a democratically elected government demonstrates a significant level of complicity in authoritarian practices.
- FEB221952
An analysis of historical evidence suggests that the former Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later BP) was involved in leveraging international proposals—including a World Bank offer described as a 'Trojan Horse'—designed to restore its control over Iranian oil operations, thereby undermining Iranian national sovereignty and contributing to the geopolitical conditions that facilitated authoritarian outcomes.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
June 25
The analysis details high-level executive political maneuvers aimed at influencing state decisions in Iran. The strategic use of international proposals to reassert control reflects a willingness to intervene in domestic political processes for corporate gain, undermining democratic principles and reinforcing authoritarian practices.
The Anglo-Iranian oil crisis re-revisited: World Bank and geopolitics
-80
Economic Collaboration
June 25
The historical evidence indicates that a covert strategy was employed using a World Bank proposal as a cover to restore AIOC's economic control over Iran’s oil resources. This tactic exemplifies economic imperialism and structural collusion that subverted Iranian sovereignty for corporate benefit, reinforcing authoritarian mechanisms in the region.
The Anglo-Iranian oil crisis re-revisited: World Bank and geopolitics
Alternatives

Moscow, Russia
-46.67
London, United Kingdom
-39.18

Hanoi, Vietnam
1.78

Cairo, Egypt
-2.00

Houston, USA
-6.57

Calgary, Canada
-20.45
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
-25.00

Egypt
-40.62

Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
-54.02

Corporation
15.45
Industries
- 211120
- Crude Petroleum Extraction
- 324110
- Petroleum Refineries
- 324191
- Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing
- 486110
- Pipeline Transportation of Crude Oil