Yahoo Inc.'s news platform published an in‐depth article detailing the far‑right Project 2025 manifesto—a blueprint that includes proposals to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, purge LGBTQ+ protections, and restructure federal employment. By exposing these authoritarian proposals, the coverage informs the public and contributes to resisting far‑right ideologies.

FEC data identifies Yahoo Inc.'s political engagement via its registered Political Action Committee (Yahoo Inc. PAC). The committee overview provides mailing address and administrative details, with no explicit indication of support for authoritarian or far‐right causes.

Yahoo Inc. has outlined a comprehensive Business and Human Rights approach, emphasizing adherence to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ongoing human rights due diligence, transparency in reporting government requests, and active board oversight, all aimed at safeguarding free expression, privacy, and non-discrimination.

Yahoo complied with a directive from US intelligence agencies, deploying custom software to scan customers' emails in real-time, an act widely criticized for undermining privacy and civil liberties.

In 2015, Yahoo Inc. secretly built a custom software program to scan incoming user emails for specific terms as directed by U.S. intelligence officials. The decision, which bypassed standard internal oversight and led to the resignation of the Chief Information Security Officer, reflects the company’s compliance with a classified government directive seeking broad surveillance capabilities.

An investigative report details longstanding issues with the management of the Yahoo Human Rights Fund (YHRF). Allegations include mismanagement of settlement funds for Chinese dissidents, pressure on plaintiffs to divert portions of their settlements, and misleading public statements that deflected accountability. These practices have harmed vulnerable communities and obscured the company’s real commitment to human rights.

Yahoo challenged government demands to surrender user data, fighting a legal battle after the NSA threatened a $250,000 per day fine for non-compliance. Although the company argued that the demands were illegal, it eventually yielded to the pressure, as detailed in unsealed court documents.