Company Directory - X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.)
Company Details - X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.)
X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.)
WebsiteSan Francisco, United States
ISIN: US90184L1026
X is a social media platform that allows users to post and interact through short messages known as tweets, limited to 280 characters. It provides a space for users to share news, opinions, and multimedia content, fostering public discourse and community engagement.
CCI Score
CCI Score: X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.)
-37.47
0.03%
Latest Event
Settlement in First Amendment Dispute
X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.) reached a settlement with the state of California that ended a high-profile First Amendment dispute over content moderation transparency requirements. The settlement, filed on February 24, 2025, resulted in the state paying nearly $350,000 in attorneys’ fees to X Corp, and parts of Assembly Bill 587 were declared unconstitutional.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.) is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- FEB242025
X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.) reached a settlement with the state of California that ended a high-profile First Amendment dispute over content moderation transparency requirements. The settlement, filed on February 24, 2025, resulted in the state paying nearly $350,000 in attorneys’ fees to X Corp, and parts of Assembly Bill 587 were declared unconstitutional.
+15
Public and Political Behavior
April 16
The resolution of the dispute can be seen as a positive development from a First Amendment perspective, as it curtails government overreach in compelling corporate disclosure of content moderation policies. This outcome reinforces free speech protections, which are crucial for marginalized voices, even though it was reached via a settlement rather than proactive reform.
California and X Corp. Reach Settlement in First Amendment Dispute
- FEB222025
On February 22, 2025, X Corp CEO Elon Musk used the company’s platform to post and pin a message endorsing Germany’s far-right, anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party ahead of the national election. This action, which included resharing a tweet from a conservative activist, has drawn sharp criticism from political leaders and highlights the platform's role in disseminating authoritarian narratives.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
April 16
Elon Musk, acting in his capacity as CEO, actively endorsed a far-right political party on X. This executive political engagement on a major social media platform promotes authoritarian and xenophobic ideologies, reflecting a misuse of corporate influence in political discourse.
Elon Musk Boosts Germany’s Far-Right AfD Party Again Ahead Of Sunday’s Election
-70
Media Influence and Propaganda
April 16
By leveraging X Corp's media platform to amplify far-right messages, the company is implicated in the dissemination of propaganda that can erode democratic values. The use of the platform for political persuasion underlines the potential for media influence to support authoritarian movements.
Elon Musk Boosts Germany’s Far-Right AfD Party Again Ahead Of Sunday’s Election
- FEB172025
Elon Musk, CEO of X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.), launched an online attack on a blind critic who testified against his U.S. DOGE Service on Capitol Hill, with his actions described as juvenile bigotry that spurred a mob response.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
April 16
Elon Musk's decision to personally engage in a targeted online attack against a vulnerable critic demonstrates a misuse of his executive influence. This behavior undermines democratic discourse and is indicative of authoritarian, exclusionary tactics by a corporate leader.
Elon Musk uses his X influence to target critics, federal workers ...
-70
Media Influence and Propaganda
April 16
The incident highlights the misuse of the X platform's influence, where Musk’s rhetoric not only targets dissenting voices but also indirectly fosters a toxic environment that can incite further harassment. This reflects a broader pattern of using media influence to undermine inclusive public discourse.
Elon Musk uses his X influence to target critics, federal workers ...
- AUG062024
X Corp (formerly Twitter) has initiated a federal antitrust lawsuit against the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), alleging that the advertising group engaged in a conspiracy that resulted in billions of dollars in lost advertising revenue and compromised fair competition in the social media landscape.
+40
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 16
The lawsuit is an effort by X Corp to challenge alleged collusive practices in the advertising market, thereby promoting competitive fairness and ethical business practices. This legal action is viewed as a move to restore integrity in market operations.
Elon Musk, X Lawsuit Alleges Advertising Association ‘Conspiracy’ Violated Federal Antitrust Law
+20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 16
By pursuing a legal remedy against an advertising consortium alleged to distort market competition, X Corp aims to disrupt potential monopolistic structures. This action supports economic fairness and can counteract undue economic influence, thereby aligning with anti-authoritarian principles.
Elon Musk, X Lawsuit Alleges Advertising Association ‘Conspiracy’ Violated Federal Antitrust Law
- JAN092024
On January 9, 2024, X Corp suspended several high-profile journalists without providing explanations for the actions. The suspensions, described as efforts to silence critics, were later reversed, raising serious concerns about free speech and the authoritarian use of platform policies.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
April 16
The suspension of journalists without transparent reasoning undermines democratic discourse and free speech, reflecting a repressive political stance by the company.
Elon Musk Accused Of 'Silencing His Critics' As X Suspends Journalists
-40
Technology and Services Impact
April 16
The opaque and inconsistent enforcement of platform rules, demonstrated by the abrupt suspensions and subsequent reversals, reflects a repressive use of technology that may be employed to silence dissent.
Elon Musk Accused Of 'Silencing His Critics' As X Suspends Journalists
- DEC152023
On December 15, 2023, Elon Musk, CEO of X Corp, spoke at the Atreju political convention organized by Italy's Fratelli d'Italia. His appearance at an event linked to far-right political movements has raised concerns about the company’s alignment with authoritarian ideologies.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 16
Elon Musk’s participation in a political event organized by a far-right party signals an affinity with authoritarian ideologies, which can undermine democratic discourse and contribute to repressive political engagement.
Elon Musk Accused Of 'Silencing His Critics' As X Suspends Journalists
- SEP082023
X Corp, formerly Twitter, has filed a lawsuit contesting California's AB 587, a law that mandates social media companies to publicly disclose details of their content moderation practices. The lawsuit argues that the law compels the company to adopt politically charged stances, violating its constitutional right to free speech.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
April 16
By challenging a law designed to promote transparency and accountability in content moderation, X Corp is seen as resisting measures that could enhance public oversight and protect marginalized communities. The legal action appears to be aimed at evading regulatory measures that enforce responsible political behavior, which is concerning from an anti-fascist perspective.
X, formerly Twitter, challenges California’s new transparency law as unconstitutional
- AUG012023
X Corp (formerly Twitter, Inc.) has initiated legal action against the Center for Countering Digital Hate over claims of increasing hate speech and disinformation on its platform following Elon Musk's takeover.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 16
The lawsuit appears to be a strategic move to silence criticism from an anti-hate group, a tactic reminiscent of broader authoritarian approaches to suppress dissent. This action impacts public discourse and reflects negatively on public and political behavior.
Elon Musk's X Corp sues anti-hate speech group over Twitter claims
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 16
By pursuing legal action against a group focused on combating hate speech, X Corp raises concerns about its commitment to ethical responsibility and transparency. This litigation can be interpreted as an effort to deflect legitimate criticisms and avoid accountability, which is troubling from a business ethics standpoint.
Elon Musk's X Corp sues anti-hate speech group over Twitter claims
Alternatives
Mountain View, United States
-10.10
Mountain View, United States
-15.87
Los Angeles, United States
-23.45
Menlo Park, United States
-32.43
Menlo Park, United States
-45.65
New York, United States
-50.31
San Francisco, United States
-51.04
Menlo Park, United States
-53.62
Mountain View, United States
-65.49
Corporation
-28.37
Corporate Financials
- Revenue
- 2023
- $5.00B
- Total Assets
- 2023
- $13.00B
- Total Equity
- 2023
- $6.00B
Employees: 2,000
Industries
- 541511
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- 541512
- Computer Systems Design Services
- 511210
- Software Publishers
- 519130
- Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals