Company Directory - World Wide Fund for Nature
Company Details - World Wide Fund for Nature

World Wide Fund for Nature
WebsiteGland, Switzerland
The World Wildlife Fund is an international non-governmental organization focused on wildlife conservation and reducing humanity's footprint on the environment.
CCI Score
CCI Score: World Wide Fund for Nature
16.54
-0.01%
Latest Event
WWF Fact Sheet: Advocating for Enhanced US Government Conservation Efforts
WWF released a fact sheet urging the US government to intensify its conservation efforts to address global environmental challenges. The publication highlights the historical leadership of US federal agencies in global conservation and calls for redoubled efforts in environmental protection.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support WWF by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
SABOTEUR
World Wide Fund for Nature is currently rated as a Saboteur.
Latest Events
- JAN012025
WWF released a fact sheet urging the US government to intensify its conservation efforts to address global environmental challenges. The publication highlights the historical leadership of US federal agencies in global conservation and calls for redoubled efforts in environmental protection.
+50
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
The WWF fact sheet demonstrates proactive public and political engagement by urging the US government to double its conservation efforts. This advocacy aligns with progressive, anti-authoritarian policies by promoting environmental stewardship and increased government accountability, a core value of responsible public behavior.
- JAN012025
WWF has launched its Deforestation and Conversion Free (DCF) Implementation Toolkit to help companies eliminate deforestation and habitat conversion from their supply chains, promoting sustainable sourcing practices.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
January 1
The rollout of the DCF Implementation Toolkit supports ethical supply chain practices by providing companies with clear guidelines to reduce deforestation and habitat conversion. This proactive approach aids in sustainable sourcing and aligns with progressive, anti-authoritarian environmental stewardship, benefiting both local communities and ecosystems.
- JAN012024
The OpenSecrets profile for the World Wildlife Fund outlines the organization’s lobbying efforts over the years, including data from 1998 to 2024. This transparency into its political advocacy highlights an effort to influence policy in favor of environmental conservation and democratic accountability.
+40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
WWF’s documented lobbying activity, as shown in the OpenSecrets profile, is positioned around promoting environmental protection and transparency in policy-making. This form of political engagement is supportive of progressive democratic processes rather than serving authoritarian or far‐right interests, earning a positive score from an anti-fascist perspective.
- JAN012024
WWF has engaged in sustained political advocacy by working closely with Congress, federal agencies, and state governments to advance robust conservation policies. Their initiatives aim to secure strong federal support for combating climate change, protecting endangered species, enhancing supply chain transparency for natural resource use, and countering unsustainable practices that harm both nature and vulnerable communities.
+80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
WWF’s work in advocating for bipartisan U.S. policies—ranging from defending the Endangered Species Act to promoting supply chain traceability in conservation-related products—demonstrates a proactive, progressive approach. By focusing on policies that mitigate environmental degradation and support public welfare, WWF is reinforcing democratic, anti-authoritarian values against exploitative practices often linked to authoritarian regimes.
- DEC312021
According to OpenSecrets data, the World Wide Fund for Nature spent $550,000 on lobbying activities in 2021 by hiring various lobbyists. This event highlights WWF's active engagement in shaping public policy, likely to advance its environmental and conservation agenda.
+50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 27
WWF’s reported expenditure on lobbying reflects a deliberate effort to influence public policy in line with its environmental conservation goals. From an anti-fascist perspective, while the mechanism of lobbying raises general concerns about disproportionate influence in democratic processes, WWF’s intent appears to be aligned with progressive environmental protection, mitigating potential authoritarian misuse. The transparent disclosure by OpenSecrets further supports public accountability in political engagement.
- OCT272021
During a US Congressional Committee hearing on international conservation, critics condemned WWF for deceit, cover-ups, and its refusal to take responsibility for alleged human rights abuses linked to its fortress conservation model. Testimonies highlighted the continued impacts of colonialism and the displacement of Indigenous communities.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
WWF was heavily criticized during the congressional hearing for its failure to acknowledge and take responsibility for human rights abuses. The public and political backlash underscores a problematic record in transparency and accountability, reflecting an anti-accountability stance in politically sensitive areas.
WWF accused of deceit, cover-ups and dishonesty in US Congressional Committee hearing
-75
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 27
WWF’s persistent failure to address and take accountability for human rights abuses—stemming from its support for fortress conservation practices linked to colonial displacement of Indigenous communities—reflects deeply unethical business practices. The ongoing cover-ups further damage trust and exacerbate harm against vulnerable populations.
WWF accused of deceit, cover-ups and dishonesty in US Congressional Committee hearing
- OCT262021
During a U.S. congressional hearing on October 26, 2021, WWF was sharply criticized for distancing itself from allegations of human rights abuses linked to its support for government park rangers involved in abuses in Africa and Asia. Despite mounting evidence and recommendations from an independent review, the organization refused to accept responsibility for its role in enabling practices such as fortress conservation that have displaced Indigenous peoples and local communities.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 27
WWF’s public response at the congressional hearing, where its leadership distanced itself from the human rights abuses associated with fortress conservation, reflects a problematic public and political behavior. Its refusal to acknowledge or apologize for the abuses undermines accountability and transparency, which are critical in safeguarding human rights.
WWF distances itself from rights abuses at U.S. congressional hearing
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 27
The report highlights WWF's systemic issues with its conservation approach, notably its support for government rangers who have been implicated in severe human rights abuses. The organization's reliance on practices that displace Indigenous peoples and local communities without adequate safeguards demonstrates a significant failure in honoring labor relations and human rights practices.
WWF distances itself from rights abuses at U.S. congressional hearing
- NOV252020
Following a series of reports alleging that anti‑poaching forces linked to WWF were involved in serious human rights abuses, an independent review criticized the organization for its inadequate response and failure to investigate claims, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 27
An independent panel led by former UN High Commissioner Navi Pillay found that WWF’s internal procedures were deficient in addressing reports of human rights abuses linked to anti‑poaching guards. The failure to act promptly on allegations reported by staff—especially in the DRC—demonstrates a lack of accountability and transparency, which, from a left‑leaning anti‑fascist perspective, can be seen as indirectly enabling oppressive practices.
Alternatives

Corporation
64.83
Arlington, United States
53.94

Corporation
15.10

Corporation
77.75

Vancouver, Canada
69.37

Arlington, United States
57.63
United Kingdom
54.48

Washington, D.C., United States
53.33

Calgary, Canada
15.26

Corporation
82.50
Industries
- 541620
- Environmental Consulting Services
- 813312
- Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations
- 924110
- Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs