Company Directory - U.S. District Court of Vermont
Company Details - U.S. District Court of Vermont

U.S. District Court of Vermont
WebsiteBurlington, United States
A federal district court that has jurisdiction over the state of Vermont, handling federal cases, including civil and criminal matters.
CCI Score
CCI Score: U.S. District Court of Vermont
70.28
-0.02%
Latest Event
U.S. District Court Reviews Habeas Petition on Detention Conditions
A judge in the U.S. District Court of Vermont has ordered additional filings in a habeas petition filed on behalf of Rumeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University student detained by ICE. The petition challenges alleged inhumane detention conditions and constitutional violations, signaling the court’s potential role as a check on executive overreach.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
LEADER
U.S. District Court of Vermont is currently rated as a Leader.
Latest Events
- APR142025
A judge in the U.S. District Court of Vermont has ordered additional filings in a habeas petition filed on behalf of Rumeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University student detained by ICE. The petition challenges alleged inhumane detention conditions and constitutional violations, signaling the court’s potential role as a check on executive overreach.
- MAY222024
The U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont denied the employers' motion to dismiss a Department of Labor lawsuit alleging that company officials used social media to retaliate against employees, reinforcing legal protections against workplace retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
+75
Public and Political Behavior
April 14
The court's decision demonstrates robust independent judicial oversight by rejecting employer claims that would have shielded retaliatory actions under the First Amendment. This action upholds democratic legal norms and ensures that labor rights are protected, thereby resisting authoritarian tendencies that could otherwise undermine worker protections.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 14
By affirming that retaliatory speech by employers on social media is not protected under the First Amendment when it infringes on workers’ rights, the court effectively reinforces labor protections and the enforcement of the Fair Labor Standards Act. This decision supports worker rights and demonstrates a commitment to ethical treatment of labor, against potential authoritarian practices in business environments.
Alternatives

Washington, D.C., United States
16.19
United States
72.95
Los Angeles, United States
69.44

New York, United States
39.78

Philadelphia, United States
36.56
Washington, D.C., United States
35.25
United States
33.43

National City, United States
26.51

United States
16.57
Washington, United States
13.47
Industries
- 921120
- Legislative Bodies
- 922130
- Legal Counsel and Prosecution