Company Directory - United States Department of Agriculture
Company Details - United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
WebsiteWashington, United States
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) oversees various aspects of farming, forestry, food supply, and nutrition. It plays a critical role in providing food assistance programs, promoting agricultural trade, ensuring food safety, and managing natural resources, thereby aiming to enhance the quality of life for all Americans.
CCI Score
CCI Score: United States Department of Agriculture
-18.32
0.01%
Latest Event
USDA Aligns with Trump Agenda, Dismantles DEI Initiatives and Launches Aggressive Trade Missions
The USDA, under Trump-appointed leadership, has canceled contracts and grants associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives inherited from the previous administration, while embarking on an aggressive international travel agenda to expand market access for American farmers. The policy shift, highlighted by a Fox News opinion piece, marks a clear departure from progressive priorities.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ENABLER
United States Department of Agriculture is currently rated as an Enabler.
Latest Events
- APR092025USDA Aligns with Trump Agenda, Dismantles DEI Initiatives and Launches Aggressive Trade Missions
-60.00
The USDA, under Trump-appointed leadership, has canceled contracts and grants associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives inherited from the previous administration, while embarking on an aggressive international travel agenda to expand market access for American farmers. The policy shift, highlighted by a Fox News opinion piece, marks a clear departure from progressive priorities.
- APR082025
The USDA registered a 2,000-acre ecological preserve in Texas that houses red wolves produced through advanced genetic modification techniques by Colossal Biosciences. This regulatory action is part of the agency’s oversight in ensuring that conservation projects meet established standards and maintains accountability in the use of cutting‑edge biotechnology.
- APR072025
USDA froze funding to Maine in response to trans inclusion in girls’ sports following President Trump’s executive order. This action, which led to a referral to the Department of Justice and a lawsuit by Maine officials, is viewed as coercive and politically motivated.
- APR032025
DOGE announced the termination of 113 federal contracts valued at $4.7 billion, including a USDA consulting contract for Peru's climate change activities. This cancellation is part of a broader cost-cutting effort by the federal government, which may undermine progressive investments in environmental and agricultural sustainability.
- APR022025
The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a pause and full review of federal funding to Maine after the state refused to comply with a Trump administration directive aimed at banning trans athletes in girls' sports. USDA Secretary Brooks Rollins stated that funding would only resume if Maine protected female athletes from trans inclusion, framing the issue as opposing a 'leftist social agenda.'
- APR022025
On April 2, 2025, USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins signaled a policy reversal by announcing that the department would cease funding DEI initiatives, including the controversial DEI seed packets. This decision, following a directive aimed at ending equity action plans, represents a shift away from progressive measures designed to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in federal agencies.
- APR012025
The USDA is offering staff buyouts and early retirement packages to employees following an executive order by President Trump to reduce the federal workforce. Affected employees who opt in will be placed on administrative leave with full pay and benefits until late September 2025, while the agency restructures its operations.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 8
The USDA’s decision to offer buyouts and early retirement options follows a direct executive order from President Trump aimed at reducing the federal workforce. This action demonstrates compliance with an authoritarian directive that undermines public service stability and employee job security.
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 8
By incentivizing employees to leave through buyouts and early retirement, the USDA is diminishing workforce stability and undermining labor rights. This measure, orchestrated under political pressure, adversely impacts the fair treatment of workers and reflects an acceptance of policies that reduce public sector worker protections.
- MAR282025
The USDA’s recent funding cuts and freezes for programs supporting local dairy farmers and food banks have exacerbated economic hardships for farmers facing higher costs from tariffs and trade tensions.
- MAR222025
In response to soaring egg prices and disruptions from the bird flu outbreak, the USDA announced a comprehensive $1 billion plan that includes biosecurity funding, vaccine research, and farmer relief programs. This initiative aims to secure domestic egg production while temporarily supplementing supplies through imports from Turkey and South Korea.
- MAR072025
USDA's official political activity webpage features Secretary Rollins publicly thanking President Trump for his trade actions, exemplifying an executive endorsement of policies viewed by many anti-fascist groups as complicit in the rise of authoritarianism.
-50
Executive Political Engagement
March 22
The USDA page highlights an instance where Secretary Rollins explicitly thanks President Trump, aligning the department's messaging with policies that many view as supportive of authoritarian practices. This executive political engagement is seen as undermining democratic norms and contributing to the rise of authoritarianism.
- FEB192025
The USDA reported political contributions of $1,458,434 in the 2024 cycle with no reported lobbying or outside spending. This transparent disclosure suggests a measured approach to political engagement that does not overtly support authoritarian practices, aligning with democratic accountability.
+30
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 22
Under the category 'Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts', USDA’s disclosure of a contribution amounting to $1,458,434 coupled with zero lobbying or outside spending indicates a level of political engagement that is transparent and restrained. This minimizes risks of fostering authoritarian influence and supports democratic processes.
- FEB032025
The article argues that the 1942 reorganization of the USDA was not a benign restructuring, but a deliberate maneuver to diminish its operational mission and open the door to regulatory capture. By aligning the agency more closely with the interests of the agricultural lobby, the reform undermined the USDA’s ability to serve public interest, thereby contributing to a landscape where corporate and special interests can influence policy to the detriment of democratic accountability.
-60
Regulatory Capture
March 22
The USDA's reorganization is presented as an intentional strategy to erode its original operational mandate and facilitate regulatory capture by powerful agricultural lobby groups. This type of capture prioritizes the interests of specific sectors over the public good, aligning with authoritarian practices that sideline accountability and transparency in governance.
- JAN272025
On January 27, 2025, under President Trump's administration, the USDA—nominated for leadership by Brooke Rollins—rolled back long‐standing diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and purged the department's independent inspector general. Critics say these moves undermine accountability, marginalize already vulnerable groups in agriculture, and signal an authoritarian realignment in federal food and agriculture policy.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
April 8
The restructuring actions—including the firing of the independent watchdog and consolidated executive support for Trump's agenda—reflect a deliberate move towards reducing democratic oversight and accountability. This authoritarian approach in public and political behavior undermines transparency and elevates executive power at the expense of institutional checks.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 8
The rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives represents a significant departure from ethical labor practices, marginalizing minority voices and weakening internal fairness. This move raises serious concerns about the department's commitment to worker rights and responsible business practices.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
April 8
The decision to fire the independent inspector general removes an important layer of regulatory oversight. This action can lead to unchecked power and potential regulatory capture, undermining the structural integrity and accountability of the USDA.
- JAN212025
On January 21, 2025, the USDA announced a slate of senior staff appointments, including Kailee Tkacz Buller, Preston Parry, and others, explicitly chosen to implement President Trump's America First agenda. These appointments signal a reinforcement of policies aligned with a far-right, authoritarian approach, potentially undermining equity and marginalized communities.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
April 8
The USDA's decision to appoint individuals known for their previous roles in the first Trump Administration and their association with the America First agenda reflects a politically charged alignment with an authoritarian agenda. This move is concerning from an anti-fascist perspective as it reinforces policies that may undermine diversity, labor rights, and equitable practices.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Announces Key Slate of Presidential Appointments
- JUN062024
The USDA finalized updated regulations, including the Transparency in Poultry Grower Contracting and Tournaments rule, aimed at safeguarding family farmers and ensuring fair business practices amid a landscape of intense meat industry lobbying and political contributions.
+40
Public and Political Behavior
April 8
USDA's regulatory update challenges the disproportionate influence of meat industry lobbying and supports democratic oversight, prioritizing protections for family farmers over corporate interests.
Meat Industry Increases Political Spending, Lobbying as USDA Updates Crucial Regulations
+30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
April 8
By enforcing greater transparency in contractual agreements between poultry growers and meatpackers, the USDA promotes ethical business practices and accountability, countering exploitative corporate behavior in the meat industry.
Meat Industry Increases Political Spending, Lobbying as USDA Updates Crucial Regulations
+20
Economic and Structural Influence
April 8
The regulatory changes contribute to a more balanced economic landscape by curbing the market dominance of large meat corporations, thus reducing structural inequalities and monopolistic practices in the agriculture sector.
Meat Industry Increases Political Spending, Lobbying as USDA Updates Crucial Regulations
- JUN062024
The USDA has finalized updated regulations including revisions to the Packers and Stockyard Act and a new poultry transparency rule aimed at addressing discrimination and increasing fairness for family farmers. These actions come amid a surge in political lobbying and spending by major meat industry groups.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
April 8
The USDA's regulatory update demonstrates strong public and political behavior by seeking to rebalance power in the agriculture sector. By promoting transparency and protecting family farmers from the disproportionate influence of large meat corporations, this action challenges entrenched industry practices that contribute to authoritarian economic dynamics.
Meat Industry Increases Political Spending, Lobbying as USDA Updates Crucial Regulations
+50
Economic and Structural Influence
April 8
By updating its regulations, the USDA is aiming to dismantle longstanding industry monopolies and mitigate the economic dominance of large meat corporations. These reforms are intended to create fairer market conditions and support structural changes that empower family farmers, countering the economic influence that often reinforces authoritarian practices.
Meat Industry Increases Political Spending, Lobbying as USDA Updates Crucial Regulations
- JUL012023
A July 2023 study published in Nature Food highlights that over 60% of forced labour risk in the US food supply stems from domestic production and processing, raising concerns about worker exploitation and potential oversight failures by the USDA. The study emphasizes the vulnerability of migrant workers and the need for stronger national regulation and worker-centered approaches.
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 8
The study identifies significant forced labour risks in US food production, implying potential shortcomings in USDA oversight regarding labor rights and human rights practices. The reliance on vulnerable migrant workers and the call for stronger regulation indicate that current practices may be insufficient to protect workers, thereby warranting a negative score.
- JAN012023
An OpenSecrets profile for 2023 shows that 1,043 clients lobbied the USDA, raising concerns about the agency's vulnerability to corporate and political influence in its policy-making processes.
-60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
April 8
The OpenSecrets data reveals that in 2023, 1,043 clients lobbied the USDA. This extensive lobbying activity suggests significant susceptibility to external influence, potentially undermining democratic accountability in agricultural policy. From an anti-fascist perspective, such vulnerability to corporate and political pressure can facilitate policies that favor elite interests over marginalized communities.
- JAN012023
An examination of human rights challenges in the agriculture supply chain, including labor rights violations such as child labor, low wages, and human trafficking, as well as unethical supply chain practices. The article calls on companies in the sector, including oversight bodies like the USDA, to adopt more robust standards to protect vulnerable communities and prevent exploitation.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
The article provides an in‐depth look at labor rights issues in the agriculture sector, highlighting critical concerns such as child labor, excessive work hours with low wages, and human trafficking. It recommends that companies enhance labor practices to prevent exploitation. This focus on human rights within the supply chain reflects a positive stance for addressing systemic abuses in the industry.
Four Human Rights Issues Every Food and Agriculture Company Needs to Understand
+75
Supply Chain Ethics
March 22
The article stresses the importance of ethical supply chain practices in agriculture to prevent exploitation, forced labor, and other human rights abuses. It calls for greater transparency and accountability in sourcing and supply chain management, urging companies to reexamine their practices. This emphasis supports a proactive approach to reducing corporate complicity in systemic human rights violations.
Four Human Rights Issues Every Food and Agriculture Company Needs to Understand
- DEC252021
A criminal investigation under Operation Blooming Onion exposed forced labor, human trafficking, and systematic exploitation within the U.S. agricultural industry. The report details how migrant workers on the H2-A visa program were compelled to work in inhumane conditions with little or no pay, highlighting significant failures to protect labor rights.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 8
The investigation uncovers severe labor abuses—including forced labor, wage theft, and unsafe working conditions—perpetrated within the U.S. farming industry. Such systemic exploitation under the H2-A visa program points to institutional shortcomings in safeguarding labor rights, an area where the USDA has oversight responsibility.
USA: Criminal investigation reveals worker exploitation in U.S. farming industry
- MAY042021
On April 21, 2021, the USDA issued a request for comments on vulnerabilities in the supply chains for agricultural commodities and food products, focusing on risks including forced labor, human rights abuses, and geopolitical disruptions. This public call for input aims to strengthen ethical supply chain practices and increase resilience through improved transparency and accountability.
+70
Supply Chain Ethics
March 22
USDA's initiative to solicit public comments on the resilience of agricultural supply chains explicitly addresses concerns related to forced labor and human rights risks. By seeking policy recommendations to mitigate these vulnerabilities, the department demonstrates a commitment to ethical supply chain practices and transparency, a positive step against complicity in labor exploitation and related authoritarian practices.
- JUN282018
The USDA facilitated a cooperative agreement with the Fair Labor Association to pilot guidelines aimed at eliminating child and forced labor within agricultural supply chains, specifically in the hazelnut industry in Turkey. This initiative is designed to enhance labor standards and ethical practices in sourcing agricultural products.
+75
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 22
The USDA's promotion of guidelines to eliminate child and forced labor in agricultural supply chains supports improved labor rights and human dignity, aligning with anti-exploitative practices that oppose authoritarian exploitation and foster better labor relations.
+80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 22
By implementing comprehensive supply chain monitoring and self-assessment tools, the USDA guidelines initiative enhances transparency and accountability in sourcing practices, reducing risks of forced labor and aligning with progressive, human-rights–oriented supply chain ethics.
Alternatives

National City, United States
26.51
Corporation
29.49
United States
72.95

Philadelphia, United States
36.56

United States
4.07
New York, United States
0.00

Toms River, United States
-30.30

United States
-35.99

New York, USA
29.00

Guntur, India
12.50
Industries
- 115112
- Soil Preparation, Planting, and Cultivating
- 115114
- Postharvest Crop Activities (except Cotton Ginning)
- 921120
- Legislative Bodies
- 921140
- Executive and Legislative Offices, Combined
- 921190
- Other General Government Support
- 922120
- Police Protection
- 111000
- Crop Production
- 112000
- Animal Production and Aquaculture
- 115000
- Agricultural Support Activities