Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties

Company Details - Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties

Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties Logo

Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties

Website

Canmore, Canada

Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties is a company that focuses on land ownership and development for the Three Sisters Mountain Village, a significant mixed-use community in Canmore, Alberta. The development aims to provide residential, commercial, and recreational spaces, enhancing the local community while facing legal and political challenges.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties

-33.74

Latest Event

Three Sisters Wins Court Battle Over Outdated Environmental Approval

Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties secured a favorable court ruling on March 14, 2025, upholding the longstanding 1992 approval for its mixed-use development in Canmore despite persistent challenges from local community groups, indigenous organizations, and environmental activists demanding a modern reassessment. The decision, based on a procedural shortfall by the opponents in serving notice to Thunderstone Quarries, highlights a regulatory environment that many critics argue favors entrenched corporate interests over community and environmental protections.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • Three Sisters Wins Court Battle Over Outdated Environmental Approval Logo
    MAR
    14
    2025

    Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties secured a favorable court ruling on March 14, 2025, upholding the longstanding 1992 approval for its mixed-use development in Canmore despite persistent challenges from local community groups, indigenous organizations, and environmental activists demanding a modern reassessment. The decision, based on a procedural shortfall by the opponents in serving notice to Thunderstone Quarries, highlights a regulatory environment that many critics argue favors entrenched corporate interests over community and environmental protections.

  • Court Dispute Over Environmental Impact Assessment Review in Canmore Logo
    NOV
    28
    2024

    A legal battle has emerged as Bow Valley Engage and Stoney Nakoda First Nation challenge the sufficiency of the environmental impact assessment governing the Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties development. In response, TSMVPL has joined ongoing judicial proceedings to contest the claim and safeguard its development plans, raising concerns about potential subversion of regulatory processes and community oversight.

  • -40

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 31

    Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties is engaging in legal tactics aimed at dismissing calls for a new environmental impact assessment, effectively prioritizing corporate development over thorough public and environmental review. This approach undermines community and indigenous groups' concerns and compromises ethical business practices.

    Court to determine jurisdiction, need for environmental impact assessment on Three Sisters lands

  • -40

    Regulatory Capture

    March 31

    By contesting the need for a new environmental impact assessment and arguing against the jurisdiction of regulatory agencies, TSMVPL appears to be leveraging procedural technicalities to sidestep renewed environmental oversight. This behavior suggests an attempt at regulatory capture, potentially limiting accountability and undermining democratic regulatory processes.

    Court to determine jurisdiction, need for environmental impact assessment on Three Sisters lands

  • Controversial Development Threatens Wildlife Corridor Logo
    OCT
    21
    2023

    After a legal defeat for the Town of Canmore, Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties advances its development plans for the Three Sisters Village area. This project, set to break ground in 2025 at the earliest, has raised serious concerns among conservationists about further degrading the last wildlife corridor that connects Banff National Park and Kananaskis Country. Experts warn that the development could significantly reduce habitat connectivity for species such as grizzly bears and wolves.

  • -40

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 31

    Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties is pushing forward with a large-scale development in a sensitive environmental area despite clear warnings from conservationists and scientific studies underlining risks to a critical wildlife corridor. This decision reflects a disregard for ethical business practices and community environmental interests, as the development endangers long-term ecological sustainability.

    Conservationists fearful of what Three Sisters developments mean for wildlife

  • -30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 31

    The progression of the development, even after local legal setbacks, indicates a strong exertion of economic influence that undermines community planning efforts and disregards environmental conservation needs. This reflects broader concerns about the company's impact on local structural and economic frameworks that are essential to public welfare.

    Conservationists fearful of what Three Sisters developments mean for wildlife

  • Court Ruling Advances TSMVPL Development Amid Community Controversy Logo
    OCT
    03
    2023

    On October 3, 2023, an Alberta Court of Appeal ruled in favor of Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties, allowing its contested area structure plans to proceed. The ruling ends a long-running legal battle with the Town of Canmore and dismisses challenges related to consistency with the 1992 NRCB approval. Critics argue that the decision sidelines amendments aimed at ensuring affordable housing and indigenous engagement, potentially prioritizing corporate interests over community welfare.

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 31

    The court ruling effectively neutralized amendments targeted at affordable housing and indigenous relations, underscoring a business practice that prioritizes corporate development over robust social responsibility. This outcome reflects a disregard for community-focused ethical considerations.

    Provincial Court of Appeal rules Three Sisters Village, Smith Creek area structure plans to proceed

  • -60

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 31

    The legal victory highlights the company’s ability to leverage the judicial system in favor of large-scale development, which may undermine local democratic processes and community input. This economic and structural influence raises concerns about prioritizing corporate gains over public interest.

    Provincial Court of Appeal rules Three Sisters Village, Smith Creek area structure plans to proceed

  • Court Upholds TSMV Development: Legal Victory for Community Housing Debate Logo
    OCT
    03
    2023

    Following the dismissal of Canmore town council's appeal by Alberta's highest court, Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties affirmed that its major mixed-use development project will proceed, emphasizing its potential to bolster community housing supply and economic growth in the Bow Valley.

  • +10

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 31

    The company issued a public statement celebrating the court's decision, framing it as beneficial for community housing and local development. This positioning demonstrates an engagement in public and political discourse amid legal challenges, reflecting a proactive stance in shaping civic debate.

    Town of Canmore loses appeal court bid to halt major developments

  • +10

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 31

    TSMV’s decision to move forward with the project is framed as a commitment to enhancing housing supply and economic development. While the development faces local controversy, the company underscores adherence to legal processes and a vision for community benefit, aligning with responsible business practices.

    Town of Canmore loses appeal court bid to halt major developments

  • +15

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 31

    The appellate court's decision not only permits TSMV’s development to proceed but also has broader implications for community structure and economic organization in Canmore. The project’s scale and potential impact on local housing supply reflect significant structural influence, albeit raising questions about local democratic control amidst corporate development.

    Town of Canmore loses appeal court bid to halt major developments

  • Company Sues Canmore Council Over Development Rejection Logo
    JUN
    08
    2022

    Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties Ltd. has filed a lawsuit against the town of Canmore and several councillors, alleging abuse of power, negligent misrepresentation, and de facto expropriation after the municipal council rejected key aspects of its mixed-use development plan, a decision that critics say undermines local democratic processes and neglects environmental concerns.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 31

    The company's decision to pursue litigation against an elected municipal body is seen as an effort to override local democratic processes. By challenging a council decision that was supported by extensive public hearings, the action is interpreted as prioritizing corporate interests over community governance, thus aligning with authoritarian corporate behavior.

    Canmore’s last stand against Three Sisters Mountain Village

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 31

    Pursuing a lawsuit in response to municipal rejection reflects a business practice that appears to devalue community input and ethical responsibility. The company's legal action, aimed at overturning a decision made after extensive public consultation and environmental review, suggests prioritization of profit and development ambitions over local and ecological welfare.

    Canmore’s last stand against Three Sisters Mountain Village

  • Aggressive Legal Action Against Local Democracy Logo
    DEC
    01
    2021

    Three Sisters Mountain Village Properties launched a $161-million lawsuit against the Town of Canmore and individual councillors, accusing them of unlawful resistance to the approved expansive development plans. This legal strategy is seen as an attempt to override local democratic authority and pressure municipal decision‐making in favor of corporate development interests.

  • -60

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 31

    The company’s decision to launch a high-stakes lawsuit against local government reflects a willingness to undermine democratic input and public governance. This aggressive legal maneuver is indicative of an approach that favors corporate authority over public interest, characteristics aligned with authoritarian practices.

    Bankruptcies and lawsuits: inside Canmore’s Three Sisters project

  • -40

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 31

    The lawsuit exemplifies the company’s use of its economic and structural influence to enforce its development agenda, often at the expense of local community needs and environmental concerns. Through aggressive legal means, the company pressures municipal processes, which raises serious issues of corporate overreach and disregard for public welfare.

    Bankruptcies and lawsuits: inside Canmore’s Three Sisters project

Industries

531110
Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings
721199
All Other Traveler Accommodation
722511
Full-Service Restaurants