The Wall Street Journal's investigative analysis of Treasury Department statements revealed that federal spending increased by approximately $150 billion under Trump’s second term, directly challenging claims of significant budget savings and exposing misleading fiscal narratives.

The Wall Street Journal published a bombshell report outlining alleged instances of President Biden’s cognitive decline. The report, which mirrored claims about Biden’s performance that later led to significant political backlash, was denounced by figures like Nancy Pelosi as a politically motivated hit piece, raising concerns about the publication’s role in contributing to partisan narratives.

In a debate-style column published on April 4, 2025, the Wall Street Journal editorial board was noted for attributing blame to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for being overly restrained following the Signalgate fiasco. This commentary reflects the paper’s influential role in shaping public opinion on U.S. foreign policy and its inclination toward advocating more aggressive, interventionist stances.

The article reports that The Wall Street Journal asserted that the federal student loan forgiveness program for public service workers rewards a politically favored group and diverts talent from the private sector. This position was cited amid broader debates over student loan policy and reflects a stance aligning with right‐wing perspectives that undermine worker protections.

The Wall Street Journal reported that White House National Security Adviser Mike Waltz had hosted multiple sensitive Signal chats regarding military operations and diplomatic negotiations, highlighting a pattern of mismanagement despite receiving backing from President Trump. The report brought increased accountability to a troubled administration element by exposing repeated security oversights.

On March 25, 2025, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial remarking on Senator Schumer’s support for a stopgap funding bill, arguing that his limited options were a consequence of problematic Democratic leadership. This commentary not only reflects the publication's stance but also contributes to a media narrative that shifts blame and minimizes accountability—a dynamic that can undermine democratic checks and balance.

The Wall Street Journal hosted a detailed investigative report examining allegations of child labor, excessive work hours, and other labor rights violations in China's coffee supply chains that serve major companies like Nestlé and Starbucks. This move directs public attention to unethical labor practices in global supply chains.

A veteran reporter has filed a discrimination lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, alleging that the paper used trumped-up performance metrics to target and fire unionized and disabled employees, raising serious concerns about its labor practices and ethical responsibility.

WSJ reporters and union representatives have pushed back during contract negotiations over wage offers, layoffs, and rising healthcare costs, highlighting a pattern of neglect in worker rights and labor conditions at The Wall Street Journal.

A senior editor at the Wall Street Journal reportedly attempted to remove a graphic from the front page because its politically sensitive content was deemed unpalatable, an act that led to the story being de-surfaced and its links removed. This censorship move has raised concerns regarding editorial independence and the suppression of politically relevant information.