Company Directory - The Ohio State University Athletics
Company Details - The Ohio State University Athletics

The Ohio State University Athletics
WebsiteColumbus, USA
The Ohio State University Athletics oversees the university's athletic programs and teams that compete in NCAA sports. It represents the athletic arm of The Ohio State University, managing student-athlete competitions, coaching, and event organization across a wide range of sports.
CCI Score
CCI Score: The Ohio State University Athletics
2.55
Latest Event
Opposition to Bill Denying Student Athletes Employment
The Ohio State University Athletics has been implicated in the strong resistance against HR 8534, a bill that would deny college athletes employee status. This stance reinforces the commitment to upholding labor rights and ensuring that student-athletes receive the recognition and protections of employee status, aligning with broader unionization efforts supported by groups like the AFL-CIO.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support OSU Athletics by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
OBJECTOR
The Ohio State University Athletics is currently rated as an Objector.
Latest Events
- JUN132024
The Ohio State University Athletics has been implicated in the strong resistance against HR 8534, a bill that would deny college athletes employee status. This stance reinforces the commitment to upholding labor rights and ensuring that student-athletes receive the recognition and protections of employee status, aligning with broader unionization efforts supported by groups like the AFL-CIO.
+80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 18
By opposing HR 8534, which would deny student-athletes the rights associated with employee status under the National Labor Relations Act, The Ohio State University Athletics showcases a commitment to fair labor practices and the protection of unionization rights. This positive step supports the rights of college athletes and aligns with anti-authoritarian views that advocate for worker protections and empowerment.
Strong Opposition Raises to Bill Denying Student Athletes Employment
- JUN132024
The House hearing on H.R. 8534, which would declare student-athletes as non-employees, raises significant labor rights concerns. This policy, if adopted, could undermine fair labor practices and union rights for student-athletes, indirectly implicating OSU Athletics in a system that prioritizes institutional interests over worker protections.
-50
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 18
By supporting or passively maintaining a system where student-athletes are not recognized as employees, OSU Athletics is entwined in a practice that denies these athletes basic labor protections. The legislative move to classify student-athletes as non-employees diminishes their rights to organize, negotiate, and secure fair conditions, reflecting a broader trend in collegiate sports that exploits student labor. This policy stance indirectly contributes to a labor environment that prioritizes institutional profits and control over individual well-being.
House Considers Bill Declaring Student Athletes Not Employees
- APR122014
In 2014, as Ohio lawmakers pushed measures to prevent college athletes from unionizing, questions arose over the labor practices of institutions like The Ohio State University Athletics. The environment created by these legislative actions may compromise the rights of student-athletes and reflect broader anti-labor policies.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 18
The Ohio State University Athletics operates within a framework that, in 2014, was subject to state measures aimed at limiting the unionization of college athletes. Such pushback against collective bargaining rights contributes to an anti-labor environment. From an anti-fascist perspective, undermining labor rights is viewed as a complicity in broader authoritarian practices, as it weakens worker protections and enhances corporate or institutional control over individuals.
Alternatives

Indianapolis, United States
-28.55
Fort Lauderdale, USA
-24.86

Storrs, United States
23.00

Corporation
28.46

Corporation
-5.50

Gainesville, USA
0.00
United Kingdom
25.29

University, Mississippi, United States
-31.92

Santa Monica, United States
-51.23

Washington, D.C., United States
-51.39
Industries
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
- 611620
- Sports and Recreation Instruction
- 711211
- Sports Teams and Clubs