On January 28, 2025, The Daily Beast published an investigative report detailing President Trump’s controversial decision to remove two key labor board members, including highlighting the unprecedented removal of the first Black woman board member, a move portrayed as an attack on legal and democratic norms.

The Daily Beast published an opinion and analysis piece contrasting Trump’s embrace of authoritarian figures with Biden’s defense of democracy. The article critiques Trump’s pro-authoritarian posture and highlights the threat autocratic leadership poses to American values, aligning with anti-fascist, progressive perspectives.

The Daily Beast published an article reporting that the National Labor Relations Board will investigate Barstool Sports founder David Portnoy’s anti-union tweets. The coverage highlights the potential infringement on workers' rights by calling attention to a public figure’s hostile stance toward unionization, thereby reinforcing the importance of protecting labor rights and exposing harmful rhetoric.

The Daily Beast published an article covering Senator Elizabeth Warren's speech in which she harshly criticized Trump's actions, linking them to authoritarian regimes. The article underscores progressive perspectives on defense spending, trade, and US foreign policy, promoting a robust anti-fascist narrative.

The Daily Beast published a detailed article outlining updated guidance from the National Labor Relations Board that designates college athletes as employees eligible for unionization. By spotlighting this development, the outlet contributes to the discourse on worker rights and implicitly challenges practices that undermine labor empowerment.

The Daily Beast published an investigative article that critiques top‑down union practices and highlights the effectiveness of grassroots, worker‑led organizing campaigns as a means to counter entrenched, corporate‐aligned labor strategies. The report examines how established unions often prioritize political cash and media strategies over genuine worker empowerment, framing grassroots efforts as a transformative force for labor.

The Daily Beast published an op-ed featuring former Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman, in which he criticizes authoritarian tendencies in the U.S. and draws parallels to regimes he fled from, reinforcing anti-authoritarian discourse.

The Daily Beast has launched its free weekly 'Pay Dirt' newsletter, which investigates and exposes questionable political donations and the influence of special interest groups ahead of the 2024 election. The initiative aims to increase transparency and hold political actors accountable, which is viewed as a positive anti-authoritarian step.

The Daily Beast published an opinion editorial warning that extreme partisanship paves the way for authoritarianism. The piece calls for unified democratic defense and reaffirms the value of liberty.

The Daily Beast released a detailed investigative report exposing unusual clusters of maxed-out donations to Rep. George Santos, highlighting potential irregularities in his fundraising activities that raise questions about coordinated efforts linked to far‑right political influences and figures such as Guo Wengui. The report underscores significant concerns regarding campaign finance transparency and accountability.

The Daily Beast published an opinion piece that criticizes GOP authoritarian tendencies post-midterms and underscores the importance of a vigilant democratic system. The article frames the midterm results as a rejection of creeping authoritarianism and highlights the role of dedicated public servants in protecting democratic values.

Barry Diller, owner of The Daily Beast, donated $120,000 to support Democratic causes, as revealed in an investigative analysis of media owners' political contributions. This donation is highlighted as a positive sign of engagement with progressive political funding.

An editorial published by The Daily Beast challenges the mischaracterization of socialism as the primary threat to American democracy, instead arguing that authoritarianism—embodied by figures like Donald Trump—poses a real danger. The piece critiques the use of loaded political language that stokes fear and distracts from the erosion of democratic norms, thereby taking a progressive stance against authoritarian narratives.