As part of the Consumer Brands Association letter to the White House, The Coca‑Cola Company was listed among iconic brands urging a reconsideration of President Trump’s one‑size‑fits‑all tariff approach. The letter argues that the tariffs impose unsustainable supply chain and pricing challenges on consumer businesses, reflecting a stance against policies that disrupt global economic stability.

In a rare public move during the post-2024 political landscape, the Coca‑Cola CEO joined other leading business figures to oppose Trump’s policies, leading to backlash including selective taxation and MAGA boycotts. This event reflects an instance of executive political engagement where corporate leadership took a principled stand against authoritarian tendencies in U.S. politics.

Data from OpenSecrets reveals that Coca-Cola contributed approximately $1.37 million and spent around $4.93 million on lobbying in the 2024 cycle. Such financial engagement raises concerns about corporate influence on politics and the potential undermining of democratic processes, aligning with broader worries about complicity in authoritarian practices.

The Coca-Cola Company has been tracked for its political contributions that may align with controversial issues during recent election cycles, raising concerns about potential support for authoritarian policies.

Coca‑Cola has refrained from directly funding state or local political candidates with corporate funds, yet it still contributes to state ballot initiatives that can influence regulatory and public policy outcomes. This indirect approach to political contributions raises concerns about corporate influence in political processes and the potential for undermining democratic accountability.

An investigative report detailed labor abuses in Maharashtra, India, including forced child labor and harmful medical practices, alongside Coca-Cola's controversial $1 million donation to the Atlanta Police Foundation, which funds the heavily criticized Cop City project. These actions have raised concerns over the company's role in perpetuating exploitative labor conditions and contributing to authoritarian over-policing in marginalized communities.

Coca-Cola HBC has adopted a comprehensive human rights policy that strongly supports labor rights, unionization, non-discrimination, and safe working conditions. The policy underscores a commitment to upholding international labor standards, ensuring that employees are treated with dignity and respect, and aligning corporate practices with ethical human rights principles.

The article reveals that The Coca-Cola Company spent $3.94 million on lobbying in 2023, raising concerns about its influence on public policy and possible complicity in supporting authoritarian practices.

Coca-Cola has been reported to lobby Congress to water down the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act, a move that undermines anti-forced labor efforts and raises concerns about its commitment to ethical supply chain practices and human rights.

The article details longstanding allegations against Coca-Cola in Colombia, describing systematic suppression of trade union rights, harassment of workers, and violent tactics including dismissals and criminalization of union activities. These actions have contributed to an oppressive labor environment that undermines democratic practices and worker rights.