Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Teal Cedar Products Ltd.

Company Details - Teal Cedar Products Ltd.

Teal Cedar Products Ltd. Logo

Teal Cedar Products Ltd.

Website

Teal Cedar Products Ltd. is a forestry company with a focus on sustainable timber harvesting and forest management in Haida Gwaii, operating since 1997. They engage in the production of high-quality cedar products while navigating ongoing legal disputes concerning timber regulations.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Teal Cedar Products Ltd.

-33.40

Latest Event

BC Court Dismisses Teal Cedar’s $75M Lawsuit Over Timber Regulations

On April 2, 2025, the BC Supreme Court ruled against Teal Cedar Products Ltd., dismissing their claim that new ecosystem-based management regulations in Haida Gwaii amounted to constructive expropriation of their forest tenures. The ruling upheld the conservation measures designed to protect culturally vital cedar forests and ecologically sensitive areas.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Teal Cedar Products Ltd. is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • BC Court Dismisses Teal Cedar’s $75M Lawsuit Over Timber Regulations Logo
    APR
    02
    2025

    On April 2, 2025, the BC Supreme Court ruled against Teal Cedar Products Ltd., dismissing their claim that new ecosystem-based management regulations in Haida Gwaii amounted to constructive expropriation of their forest tenures. The ruling upheld the conservation measures designed to protect culturally vital cedar forests and ecologically sensitive areas.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd.'s lawsuit challenged evolving environmental and indigenous protections by alleging that progressive ecosystem-based management rules devalued their property rights. This action undermines public regulatory efforts aimed at conservation and respects for community values.

    BC court rules against logging company in Haida Gwaii dispute

  • -35

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    The company's legal pursuit for $75 million compensation demonstrates a prioritization of corporate profit over ethical business practices, as it seeks to overturn regulations that are designed to safeguard environmental integrity and indigenous rights.

    BC court rules against logging company in Haida Gwaii dispute

  • -20

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 3

    The pursuit of extensive financial compensation through litigation reflects an effort to wield economic influence to counteract public interest regulatory frameworks, thereby prioritizing corporate asset protection over the broader structural interests of sustainable management and community welfare.

    BC court rules against logging company in Haida Gwaii dispute

  • Teal Cedar Products' Failed Damages Bid Over Haida Gwaii Agreement Logo
    APR
    02
    2025

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd. lost a bid for damages against the B.C. government after challenging the agreement that recognizes First Nations rights on Haida Gwaii, raising concerns about its approach to indigenous rights and ethical business practices.

  • -60

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    The company's legal action to seek damages related to an agreement upholding First Nations rights can be seen as an attempt to challenge or undermine indigenous authority, reflecting negatively on its public and political behavior.

    Teal Cedar Products loses bid for damages over Haida Gwaii agreement

  • -50

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    By pursuing litigation over timber regulations linked to the recognition of First Nations rights, the company demonstrates business practices that potentially disregard ethical responsibility towards marginalized communities.

    Teal Cedar Products loses bid for damages over Haida Gwaii agreement

  • Teal Cedar Appeals Injunction Denial in Old-Growth Logging Dispute Logo
    APR
    01
    2025

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd. announced its intention to appeal Justice Douglas Thompson's decision denying an injunction. This move comes amid protests by old-growth logging advocates and fits into the company’s broader pattern of contesting regulatory measures related to timber harvesting in Haida Gwaii.

  • -30

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    The company's decision to appeal a judicial injunction reflects the use of legal channels to counter public policy aimed at protecting environmental and community interests. This action undermines efforts designed to safeguard marginalized stakeholders and preserve natural resources.

    Old-growth logging protesters dig in as company appeals court’s injunction denial

  • -20

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    By opting to appeal the court's decision, Teal Cedar Products Ltd. demonstrates a prioritization of corporate interests over ethical business practices, suggesting a disregard for community and environmental concerns that are vital to sustainable operations.

    Old-growth logging protesters dig in as company appeals court’s injunction denial

  • -10

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 3

    The appeal against the court’s decision underscores the company’s willingness to leverage legal processes to protect its economic interests, potentially entrenching power imbalances and undermining regulatory safeguards that benefit local communities.

    Old-growth logging protesters dig in as company appeals court’s injunction denial

  • Teal Cedar Litigation Challenges Indigenous Reconciliation Logo
    DEC
    22
    2023

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd. has initiated a $75 million lawsuit against the province of B.C. and the Haida Gwaii Management Council. During the proceedings at the B.C. Supreme Court, a prominent Haida leader testified about the adverse impacts of forest industry practices on the indigenous community and environment. The outcome of the case, expected later in 2024, could have significant political and financial implications regarding reconciliation and indigenous rights in the region.

  • -20

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    The company’s decision to initiate litigation against governmental and indigenous bodies is seen as an attempt to shape political narratives and diminish indigenous voices in reconciliation efforts. This action may reinforce power imbalances and undermine the public interest in upholding indigenous rights.

    In a B.C. courtroom, the testimony of a Haida leader spans the past and future of reconciliation

  • -15

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    The litigation underscores concerns regarding the company’s approach to ethical business practices, particularly in relation to indigenous land management and sustainable practices. The action is seen as prioritizing corporate financial interests over community reconciliation and environmental stewardship.

    In a B.C. courtroom, the testimony of a Haida leader spans the past and future of reconciliation

  • -10

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 3

    The lawsuit is perceived as a strategic move by the company to leverage economic and regulatory influence, potentially pressuring public institutions and undermining indigenous sovereignty. This reflects a broader pattern of using legal avenues to influence regulatory structures in favor of corporate interests.

    In a B.C. courtroom, the testimony of a Haida leader spans the past and future of reconciliation

  • Teal Cedar’s $75M Lawsuit: Corporate Resistance to Reconciliation Logo
    DEC
    21
    2023

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd. has initiated a $75M lawsuit against the province of British Columbia and the Haida Gwaii Management Council, seeking compensation for alleged lost profits due to regulatory changes enforcing ecosystem-based management and reconciliation measures. The lawsuit is viewed as an effort to challenge policies designed to protect Indigenous rights and the environment.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    Teal Cedar’s legal action is interpreted as a corporate maneuver aimed at undermining public policies that favor reconciliation and environmental protection. By taking on government bodies and Indigenous management agencies in court, the company appears to prioritize profit over community and public welfare.

    A Haida Elder on Teal-Jones' $75M lawsuit

  • -50

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    The lawsuit, aimed at claiming $75M in lost profits, reflects a business practice that prioritizes financial gain over ethical responsibility. This approach undermines sustainable forestry practices and disregards the significance of Indigenous rights and environmental stewardship, highlighting a disregard for ethical business operations.

    A Haida Elder on Teal-Jones' $75M lawsuit

  • Teal Cedar Sues Blockade Activists for Damages Logo
    OCT
    04
    2023

    On October 4, 2023, Teal Cedar Products Ltd. filed a statement of claim in BC Supreme Court against 15 individuals, an air service company, and the 'Rainforest Flying Squad', alleging that their blockade activities caused irreparable harm and production losses. The action appears intended to intimidate environmental activists and suppress dissent.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    This legal action is a clear instance of the company using litigation to counteract public protest and dissent. By targeting environmental activists and blockade leaders, Teal Cedar exhibits a behavior that undermines democratic engagement and attempts to silence voices critical of its operations.

    Teal Cedar Ltd. is going after leaders of the Fairy Creek blockades for millions in damages. Does Teal have a case? - Analysis - Evergreen Alliance

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    By resorting to aggressive litigation against protestors rather than engaging constructively with stakeholders, Teal Cedar is reflecting poor business ethics. The action suggests a prioritization of profit and control over community and environmental concerns, undermining broader corporate social responsibility.

    Teal Cedar Ltd. is going after leaders of the Fairy Creek blockades for millions in damages. Does Teal have a case? - Analysis - Evergreen Alliance

  • Teal Cedar Sues Over Forced Logging Cut in Haida Gwaii Logo
    SEP
    07
    2023

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd. has filed a $75M lawsuit against the Province of British Columbia and the Haida Gwaii Management Council, claiming damages for being forced to halt logging in old-growth forests due to new forestry reforms aimed at reconciliation and ecological protection.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    By suing the government for damages imposed by progressive forestry reforms, Teal Cedar is challenging regulatory measures intended to support environmental protection and indigenous reconciliation, reflecting resistance to policies that promote social equity.

    A company was forced to reduce logging in Haida Gwaii’s old-growth forests. Now they’re suing for $75M

  • -30

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    The lawsuit to recover $75M underscores a prioritization of financial interests over acceptance of sustainable and equitable forestry management practices, thereby challenging the ethical responsibility expected from companies within the environmental and reconciliation framework.

    A company was forced to reduce logging in Haida Gwaii’s old-growth forests. Now they’re suing for $75M

  • Injunction Enforcement Sparks Use of State Coercion Logo
    AUG
    15
    2023

    On August 15, 2023, police resumed enforcement of a court-ordered injunction granted to Teal-Cedar Products Ltd. in the Fairy Creek Watershed to remove blockades. The company reported harassment, vandalism, and obstruction incidents, and its request for police intervention highlights a reliance on state power to secure corporate operations, potentially suppressing grassroots dissent.

  • -50

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    Teal-Cedar Products Ltd.'s active request for police enforcement of a court-ordered injunction demonstrates a reliance on state coercion to dismantle protest actions and secure their operational interests. This alignment with state power to override community dissent can be seen as underpinning authoritarian practices, which is deeply problematic from an anti-fascist perspective.

    Police enforcement of injunction order in Fairy Creek Watershed resumes

  • -30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 3

    By leveraging a legal injunction and demanding police action to clear blockades, the company exerts significant structural influence. This approach prioritizes corporate profit over community and environmental concerns, reflecting an authoritarian mechanism to suppress dissent and assert dominance over public spaces.

    Police enforcement of injunction order in Fairy Creek Watershed resumes

  • Teal Cedar Sues Over Forestry Reforms Logo
    JAN
    01
    2016

    Teal Cedar Products Ltd., operating as part of the Teal-Jones Group, initiated a $75 million lawsuit against the Province of British Columbia and the Haida Gwaii Management Council. The company claims that recent forestry reforms—rooted in enhanced environmental protections and reconciliation efforts with First Nations—have resulted in lost profits from its inability to log old-growth forests as initially planned.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    April 3

    By pursuing litigation to recoup profits lost due to progressive environmental and reconciliation policies, Teal Cedar is actively challenging the evolving public values. This legal action represents a pushback against measures that protect indigenous rights and the environment, thereby undermining public interest in sustainable resource management.

    Old-growth protections cut into $75M-profits. Will B.C. pay?

  • -35

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    April 3

    The company's decision to pursue litigation prioritizes profit over ethical business practices, disregarding the social and environmental responsibilities that come with operating on lands significantly tied to indigenous rights and ecological sustainability.

    Old-growth protections cut into $75M-profits. Will B.C. pay?

  • -20

    Economic and Structural Influence

    April 3

    The litigation underscores the company’s attempt to use economic and legal influence to contest regulatory changes that realign resource management with public and indigenous interests. This action disrupts the balance of public resource governance and reflects a broader challenge to progressive economic reform.

    Old-growth protections cut into $75M-profits. Will B.C. pay?

Industries

321113
Sawmills
321918
Other Millwork (including Flooring)
321999
All Other Miscellaneous Wood Product Manufacturing