Company Directory - Rath
Company Details - Rath
Rath
Rath is involved in food production technologies.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Rath
-44.00
0.03%
Latest Event
Concerns Over Labor Exploitation in US Food Supply Chains
An analysis from BSR warns of severe labor rights abuses and exploitative practices in US food supply chains. Companies in the food production technology sector like Rath may be complicit if they do not adopt robust measures to protect migrant workers and ensure ethical sourcing.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Rath is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- MAR052025
An analysis from BSR warns of severe labor rights abuses and exploitative practices in US food supply chains. Companies in the food production technology sector like Rath may be complicit if they do not adopt robust measures to protect migrant workers and ensure ethical sourcing.
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
The article highlights significant labor rights abuses affecting migrant workers in the US food sector, pointing to systemic issues such as wage theft, unsafe conditions, and lack of legal protections. As a food production technologies company, Rath may be implicated in these practices if it does not uphold strong labor standards.
Managing Migrant Labor Human Rights Risks in US Food Value Chains
-60
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
The discussion on supply chain vulnerabilities in the article underscores the potential for ethical breaches in sourcing practices. Without rigorous oversight, companies like Rath risk being complicit in broader systemic failures that enable forced labor and exploitation within their supply chains.
Managing Migrant Labor Human Rights Risks in US Food Value Chains
- SEP222024
The article details how food manufacturers, a category in which Rath operates, have made significant political contributions to both Democratic and Republican campaigns. These contributions, with a tilt towards Republican candidates, raise concerns from an anti-fascist perspective regarding corporate influence over democratic processes.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 19
Food manufacturers have contributed substantial funds to political campaigns, including significant donations to figures associated with authoritarian policies. This behavior raises alarm among anti-fascist groups as it can skew democratic outcomes in favor of corporate and authoritarian interests.
-30
Economic Collaboration
March 19
The aggregated donations by food manufacturers signify a coordinated economic strategy to influence political outcomes. This practice, which may indirectly support authoritarian tendencies by prioritizing corporate interests over democratic values, is of significant concern.
- JUL242023
A study published on July 24, 2023, reveals widespread forced labor risks in the U.S. food supply chain, highlighting severe labor exploitation and supply chain vulnerabilities. Given Rath's involvement in food production technologies, this event raises concerns about potential complicity in unethical labor practices and problematic supply chain management.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
The study underscores a high risk of forced labor in the U.S. food system, reflecting severe labor rights abuses. Companies involved in food production technologies, such as Rath, are implicated by extension if they do not rigorously address labor exploitation risks within their own operations and supply chains.
Risk of Forced Labor Is Widespread in U.S. Food Supply, Study Finds
-70
Supply Chain Ethics
March 19
The article highlights significant vulnerabilities in the U.S. food supply chain that contribute to forced labor practices. This reflects poorly on companies involved in food production technologies like Rath if their supply chain oversight is inadequate, thereby risking complicity in unethical practices.
Risk of Forced Labor Is Widespread in U.S. Food Supply, Study Finds
- OCT112022
A report from Ethical Consumer highlights persistent labor rights abuses, poverty wages, and exploitative working conditions in the food industry. Such practices raise serious concerns about the ethical responsibility of companies like Rath, who are involved in food production technologies.
-75
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
The Ethical Consumer report details systemic labor rights abuses including poverty wages and insecure employment within the food industry. As a company involved in food production technologies, Rath could be complicit in supporting a supply chain that exploits workers, thereby aligning with broader issues of unethical business practices.
- OCT082018
An analysis of persistent labor exploitation and poor working conditions in the agricultural sector highlights systemic abuses that may be indirectly enabled by companies in the food production technologies space, like Rath.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 19
The article provides a detailed account of long-standing labor exploitation in the US agricultural system, including low wages, unsafe conditions, and systemic abuse of workers. While Rath is involved in food production technologies, the broader food system's reliance on exploited labor raises concerns about technology providers indirectly benefiting from or enabling these oppressive practices. This rating reflects the potential complicity of companies in an industry that has historically undermined workers' rights, a key issue for anti-fascist and labor justice advocates.
- JAN012012
Analysis of Rath Group's lobbying profile as reported by OpenSecrets, which shows that the firm engaged in lobbying efforts in 2012 with a total spending of $70,000. Such activities raise concerns about potential influence on political processes favoring authoritarian interests.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 19
Rath Group’s lobbying profile raises red flags from an anti-fascist perspective. The firm’s reported $70,000 spending in 2012 demonstrates its involvement in financial activities aimed at influencing political decision-making. Such lobbying practices can undermine democratic accountability and potentially facilitate policies that favor authoritarian regimes or far-right ideologies.