The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide whether the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) can be sued in American courts over alleged involvement in terror attacks in the Middle East. Previous rulings by a federal appeals court in New York had protected the PLO and Palestinian Authority from such lawsuits, emphasizing fair legal process despite Congressional efforts. The outcome could reinforce judicial safeguards for politically engaged organizations and ensure due process, a stance that aligns with anti-authoritarian principles.

During a Moscow-hosted meeting held between February 29 and March 2, 2024, major Palestinian factions including Fatah and Hamas agreed to seek unity under the Palestine Liberation Organization, affirming its role as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. The declaration also included condemnation of Israeli aggression and appreciation for Russian support.

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) released a detailed report documenting extensive human rights abuses under the Israeli occupation. The report highlights systemic violations including forced displacement, targeted attacks on civilians, and other war crimes, calling for urgent international intervention to address these issues.

Under President Mahmoud Abbas, the PLO reshuffled its executive committee by promoting loyalists—such as Hussein al-Sheikh, Ramzi Khoury, and Rawhi Fattouh—to key positions. This move, intended to secure Abbas's influence and streamline succession, has drawn criticism for centralizing power and undermining internal democratic processes.

The Oslo Accords allowed the exiled leadership of the PLO to return only to territories occupied in 1967, a provision that paved the way for the creation of the interim Palestinian Authority. Over time, this framework enabled the consolidation of power into an authoritarian regime under leaders like Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, contributing to long-term democratic deficits and repression in Palestinian governance.

The application of Section 1003(2) of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 prohibits the expenditure of funds by the Palestine Liberation Organization in the United States, impacting its diplomatic visit and efforts towards establishing an independent State of Palestine. This event highlights a governmental measure that restricts progressive, self‐determination–oriented political activity.