An OFCCP investigation revealed systematic hiring discrimination against African American applicants between 2011 and 2012. Although the resolution agreement includes remedial measures such as a $3.5 million settlement and commitments to monitor and enhance hiring practices, the underlying behavior represents a significant violation of labor rights and human dignity, reflecting negatively on the company’s adherence to equitable labor practices.

U.S. Department of Labor and Newport News Shipbuilding Enter Agreement to Resolve Alleged Hiring Discrimination

Newport News Shipbuilding, a major defense contractor division, has multiple representatives registered for lobbying activities as evidenced by the VPAP data. Such persistent lobbying efforts suggest a proactive strategy to influence political processes and regulatory frameworks. These actions may contribute to democratic erosion by aligning corporate interests with policies that favor concentrated power, aligning with broader authoritarian practices.

Newport News Shipbuilding (Lobbying Client) - VPAP

The ratification of a union contract by United Steelworkers Local 8888 is a strong positive indicator for labor relations and human rights practices. It demonstrates that Newport News Shipbuilding supports fair labor practices and worker empowerment, aligning with anti-fascist values by promoting democratic workplace rights and resisting authoritarian exploitation.

Union members ratify contract at Newport News Shipbuilding

The settlement stemmed from a finding by the OFCCP that Newport News Shipbuilding engaged in discriminatory hiring practices by systematically denying job opportunities to Black applicants for multiple positions. Despite the company’s denial of intentional misconduct, the conciliation agreement and financial settlement highlight significant shortcomings in upholding labor rights and equal employment opportunities, reflecting negatively on its business practices and ethical responsibility.

Newport News Shipbuilding settles employment discrimination charges

The company was found to have engaged in discriminatory hiring practices by failing to apply its selection criteria uniformly, disadvantaging Black applicants. This poor labor relations practice, evidenced by a $3.5 million settlement, reflects significant ethical and human rights concerns that are contrary to fair labor practices and corporate responsibility.

Shipbuilder to Pay $3.5 Million to Settle Hiring Bias Claims (1)

The EEOC lawsuit against Huntington Ingalls, involving its Newport News Shipbuilding division, highlights severe shortcomings in labor relations and human rights practices. By refusing to hire a pipefitter due to his hearing impairment—even when the candidate requested to use his hearing aids—the company displayed discriminatory practices that undermine fair employment and accommodation standards. This behavior not only violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) but also contributes to a broader climate where authoritarian and exclusionary business practices are tolerated.

Huntington Ingalls Sued By EEOC For Disability Discrimination

The documented $3,140,000 in lobbying expenditure by Newport News Shipbuilding in 2000 illustrates a robust effort to sway political outcomes. Such lobbying activities, often aimed at shaping regulatory and legislative environments, can undermine democratic processes and potentially support authoritarian policies by aligning corporate interests with political power. This negative score reflects concerns regarding the transparency and ethical implications of excessive corporate political influence.

Newport News Shipbuilding Lobbying Profile • OpenSecrets