The article highlights Nestlé's role in the corporatization of UK veterinary practices following regulatory changes. It notes that Nestlé, alongside other large corporations, has contributed to a business model that prioritizes profit over affordable, quality care, resulting in higher costs for pet owners and increased pressure on veterinary staff.

Nestlé reported a 13.5% reduction in its 2023 GHG emissions, largely driven by sustainability initiatives within its operations and supply chain. The company is working with suppliers and farmers to adopt regenerative agriculture practices, with 15.2% of its raw materials sourced from such practices by the end of 2023 and a target of 20% by 2025. This action demonstrates a commitment to more ethical and environmentally responsible sourcing methods.

Nestlé's latest sustainability report highlights a 13.5% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions alongside progress in sourcing raw materials from regenerative agriculture—15.2% by the end of 2023 with a target of 20% by 2025—demonstrating a progressive approach to ethical supply chain practices.

Nestlé released its latest sustainability report outlining significant steps in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, advancing regenerative agriculture, improving water stewardship, and setting ambitious targets for sustainable sourcing and plastic waste reduction. The report also acknowledges challenges in fully addressing Scope 3 emissions and enhancing packaging sustainability.

An Ethical Consumer report has labeled Nestlé's cocoa sourcing practices as 'inadequate', highlighting that only 50% of its cocoa globally is certified by the Rainforest Alliance, raising concerns over fair compensation to cocoa farmers and potential labor abuses. Nestlé defended its efforts with initiatives like the Nestlé Cocoa Plan and an income accelerator programme, but the report underscores ongoing issues including child labor and deforestation risks in its supply chain.

In an extensive interview with NZZ, former Nestlé CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe argued that companies should steer clear of engaging in politics. He recalled his experiences from managing operations in politically charged environments including Syria, Iran, South Africa, and Cuba, and maintained that taking political stances could lead to undue pressure and accusations. His observation reflects a longstanding corporate strategy of neutrality, which, from an anti‑fascist perspective, avoids utilizing corporate power to oppose authoritarian measures.

On August 3, 2023, Nestlé registered Mercury Public Affairs, with Shannon Campagna leading the effort, to bolster its lobbying on plant-based policy. This move follows the company's ongoing engagement in plant-based food initiatives, highlighting its strategic political engagement in the food industry.

OpenSecrets reported that Nestlé spent $848,000 on lobbying activities during the period from January 1 to March 31, 2023, highlighting its efforts to influence public policy.

Multiple international protests, from Indonesia and Pakistan to New York and Australia, have mobilized trade union activists demanding the reinstatement of dismissed union members and fair labor practices at Nestlé facilities. The demonstrations highlight accusations of union busting and unfair treatment of contract workers, reinforcing anti-authoritarian labor rights demands.

Confidential documents reveal that Nestlé engaged in extensive lobbying efforts, including meetings with high-level government advisors such as those to President Macron and the Secretary General of the Élysée, to secure regulatory exemptions for using banned water filters despite health warnings. The company also intensified pressure by threatening job cuts.

Nestlé has been widely criticized for its reliance on single-use, non-recyclable plastic packaging that contributes to long-term environmental pollution, affecting wildlife and marginalized communities.

A Harvard Law School article details problematic arguments by Nestlé's legal team in defending the company in litigation over widespread child labor abuse on West African cocoa farms. The defense strategy, which risks undermining accountability for human rights abuses, illustrates deeper issues in Nestlé's supply chain ethics and labor practices.

Nestlé is facing allegations and lawsuits for its alleged complicity in child slave labor on cocoa farms in the Ivory Coast, implicating the company in severe human rights abuses within its supply chain.

The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit alleging that Nestlé aided and abetted child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa farms. In response, a Nestlé spokesperson reiterated that child labor is unacceptable and emphasized the company’s commitment to combating child labor in the cocoa industry. The decision was based on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the company to continue its stated efforts against child labor.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case alleging that Nestlé, along with Cargill, knowingly sourced cocoa from farms employing child slave labor, a move that could limit victims' ability to seek justice in U.S. courts. The hearing featured critical questions from both conservative and liberal justices and noted that the Trump administration is backing the companies’ legal arguments.

Nestlé has been accused of depleting and contaminating groundwater sources in Pakistan, exacerbating water scarcity and contributing to public health risks in affected communities.

The article details Nestlé's persistent lobbying efforts in the United States, spending millions over recent years—including $1.31 million in 2016—to shape legislation on water usage, cocoa trade, labor, and environmental regulations. It highlights the company's use of in-house and external lobbying resources as well as its ties to groups like ALEC, which craft model bills favorable to corporate interests.

Since the 1980s, Nestlé has been extracting vast quantities of water from drought-affected areas in California, exploiting public resources with minimal financial compensation, raising concerns about sustainability and public good.

Nestlé aggressively marketed baby formula as a superior alternative to breast milk in developing countries during the 1970s, employing deceptive practices that led to detrimental health impacts on infants and contributed to nutritional deficiencies in vulnerable populations.