Company Directory - National Academies of Sciences
Company Details - National Academies of Sciences

National Academies of Sciences
WebsiteThe National Academies of Sciences is a prestigious organization that provides expert advice on critical scientific issues, including health, safety, and technology for policymakers and the public. They offer authoritative studies and recommendations based on rigorous investigation and expert knowledge in various fields.
CCI Score
CCI Score: National Academies of Sciences
63.24
-0.03%
Latest Event
Proposed Independent Vaccine Transparency Report
A vaccine transparency initiative proposed to include an independent expert report—potentially authored by the National Academies of Sciences—to safeguard vaccine safety data from political interference, as revealed in discussions following the forced resignation of a top FDA official.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support NAS by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
LEADER
National Academies of Sciences is currently rated as a Leader.
Latest Events
- APR072025
A vaccine transparency initiative proposed to include an independent expert report—potentially authored by the National Academies of Sciences—to safeguard vaccine safety data from political interference, as revealed in discussions following the forced resignation of a top FDA official.
- APR012025
Members of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released an open letter on April 1, 2025, warning that Trump administration policies, including cuts to research funding and censorship of scientific terminology, are fostering a 'climate of fear' in the scientific community. The letter highlights how these arbitrary policy actions are undermining scientific integrity and independence.
+80
Executive Political Engagement
April 7
The National Academies, through its open letter, demonstrated strong political engagement by actively resisting authoritarian interference in science. Their public focus on protecting academic freedom and scientific integrity counters the repressive measures imposed by the Trump administration, aligning with anti-fascist and progressive values.
Scientists say Trump policies are causing a 'climate of fear' in ... - NPR
- MAR312025
Elected members of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine signed a public letter protesting the Trump administration's aggressive cutbacks in research funding, interference in academic inquiry, and censorship of scientific data. The letter warns that these policies undermine scientific integrity and the future of U.S. innovation.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The letter represents a strong public stand against authoritarian policies that jeopardize independent scientific inquiry, highlighting the organization’s commitment to defending academic freedom and opposing censorship and funding cuts. This is a clear anti-authoritarian action that supports transparency, worker rights in academia, and the broader public interest.
Read the Letter Scientists Sent to the Trump Administration - The New York Times
- MAR312025
Nearly 2,000 elected members of the National Academies issued an open letter on March 31, 2025, calling on the Trump administration to halt what they describe as a wholesale assault on U.S. science, marked by funding cuts, mass firings, and interference in independent research.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
This public intervention by top scientists represents a strong stand against authoritarian policies that undermine independent scientific inquiry. By openly challenging the Trump administration's drastic cuts and repressive measures targeting the scientific community, the National Academies demonstrate a commitment to transparency and evidence-based policymaking, thereby aligning with anti-fascist principles.
National Academies members urge Trump to end 'assault' on science - STAT
- MAY212024
An interdisciplinary group of experts associated with the National Academies of Sciences published an editorial in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, urging the scientific community to adopt principles of human accountability and responsibility in the use of artificial intelligence. The call includes establishing a Strategic Council on the Responsible Use of AI to safeguard scientific integrity, a measure seen as bolstering ethical standards in technology amid rising concerns over authoritarian misuse.
+50
Technology and Services Impact
April 7
The editorial promotes responsible AI practices that are essential in preventing the exploitation of technology for authoritarian purposes. By calling for human accountability in research, the National Academies of Sciences contributes positively to ethical technology development, helping to protect democratic values and marginalized communities.
- JAN012024
A multidisciplinary study published on January 1, 2024 references the work of National Academies of Sciences and Medicine (2023) to highlight issues of forced labor, human trafficking, and labor abuses in supply chains. The study underscores the importance of evidence-based policy responses to modern slavery and exploitation, an effort that bolsters protections for workers and marginalized communities.
+60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
April 7
The research cited from the National Academies contributes to shedding light on forced labor and labor trafficking, reinforcing the need for rigorous labor rights safeguards. This positive emphasis on human rights practices aligns with efforts to expose unethical labor conditions.
Forced labor and Transportation: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
+60
Supply Chain Ethics
April 7
The inclusion of research on forced labor in supply chains highlights systemic labor abuses and supports transparency. By drawing attention to these issues, the National Academies of Sciences assists in advocating for ethical supply chain practices and protecting vulnerable workers.
Forced labor and Transportation: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
- NOV292023
A perspective paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences highlights instances of self‐censorship by scientists for prosocial reasons while calling for enhanced transparency in peer review. The recommendations aim to expose bias and counteract practices that may inadvertently harm marginalized communities.
+60
Media Influence and Propaganda
April 7
By providing a platform for a perspective piece that exposes scientific self‑censorship and advocates for transparency in editorial practices, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences — run by the National Academies of Sciences — fosters accountability in academic publishing. This transparency is crucial in countering obscure practices that could perpetuate biases and, by extension, authoritarian narratives that harm marginalized groups.
Worries of Harm Lead to Scientific Censorship - Inside Higher Ed
- OCT012023
The National Academies of Sciences convened a committee to examine the root causes of medical product shortages and to recommend measures for enhancing supply chain resilience during both normal and emergency periods.
+60
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
By convening a committee focused on the security of America's medical product supply chain, the National Academies of Sciences is taking a proactive, evidence-based approach to safeguard public health. This initiative promotes transparency, accountability, and resilience in a critical area of infrastructure, supporting democratic oversight and countering vulnerabilities that authoritarian actors could exploit.
- JUN272023
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released a report, in response to a congressional mandate, recommending that U.S. colleges and universities implement measures to identify and mitigate risks associated with foreign-funded language and culture institutes. The report emphasizes protecting academic freedom and national security by vetting partnerships, given potential misalignments between sponsoring nations and U.S. democratic values.
+70
Public and Political Behavior
April 7
The report demonstrates a proactive, democratically-aligned effort to identify and reduce risks posed by foreign-funded cultural and language institutes that could undermine academic freedom and national security. By providing actionable recommendations, the National Academies support measures that defend democratic principles and resist authoritarian influences.
Alternatives

Dublin, Ireland
73.80

Berkeley, United States
68.46
Melbourne, Australia
65.05

Boston, United States
60.63

Washington, D.C., United States
53.33

Cambridge, United States
47.21

Bedford, United States
23.92

Australia
23.44

Silver Spring, United States
-5.41

Cambridge, USA
-13.09
Industries
- 541690
- Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
- 541720
- Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
- 611310
- Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools