The article highlights a systemic issue within the tech sector regarding human rights due diligence and responsiveness to abuse allegations. With response rates steadily declining (from 57% in 2018 to 40% in 2023) and overall poor accountability demonstrated by many firms, there is concern that companies like Nanoleaf Inc., which are not singled out for exceptional performance, could be underperforming in their labor relations and human rights practices. This trend is particularly troubling when viewed through an anti-fascist lens where corporate neglect of human rights contributes to broader authoritarian practices.

Accusations and actions: A decade tracking tech company responses to human rights allegations

Nanoleaf's pivot to sourcing and distributing medical-grade masks during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates a strong commitment to ethical responsibility and corporate social responsibility. By ensuring that products meet strict international testing standards and distributing them at cost while donating profits, the company highlights a proactive approach in supporting community health and combating systemic neglect. This ethical maneuver, especially in challenging times, contrasts with practices that may indirectly support authoritarian neglect or exploitation.

Toronto-based Nanoleaf tapped its international supply chain to join the fight against COVID-19

The Knoji article raises questions about Nanoleaf's ethical operations, including inquiries into sustainability, eco-friendly supply chains, and fair trade practices. An insider comment confirms that Nanoleaf supports ethical practices. While this demonstrates a commitment to ethical business practices, the limited detail prevents a higher score. Thus, a moderately positive rating of 60 is assigned under Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility.

Does Nanoleaf use ethical practices? — Knoji