According to OpenSecrets data, Montgomery Ward has no identified political contributions or lobbying efforts in the 2024 cycle. This lack of financial engagement in political funding minimizes the potential to support authoritarian practices, reflecting a relatively positive stance in terms of anti-fascist corporate behavior.

Montgomery Ward Profile: Totals • OpenSecrets

Based on the OpenSecrets report, Montgomery Ward's PAC did not make significant contributions to other political action committees or party committees during the 2021-2022 election cycle. From an anti-fascist perspective, this non-engagement in political funding can be viewed as neither bolstering nor directly opposing authoritarian influence. The neutrality of such financial behavior yields a mildly positive score, indicating an absence of complicity in using political contributions to influence democratic processes.

Montgomery Ward PAC to PAC/Party • OpenSecrets

The OpenSecrets profile details Montgomery Ward's historical lobbying efforts, which are indicative of corporate engagement in influencing political processes. Such actions are seen by critics as contributing to the erosion of democratic accountability, aligning the company with practices that ultimately support authoritarian influence. The lack of updated lobbying disclosures for 2024 further fuels concerns over transparency and ethical political behavior.

Montgomery Ward Profile: Lobbying • OpenSecrets

The legal case reveals significant allegations of racial discrimination and retaliatory practices against employees at Montgomery Ward. The claim that minority employees faced harassment and were denied promotions indicates problematic labor relations and human rights practices. Such systemic issues contribute to an environment that undermines social equity, thereby aligning with broader concerns over corporate complicity in oppressive practices.

Jackson v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.

Montgomery Ward was embroiled in a legal dispute regarding its handling of labor disputes, where practices such as employee surveillance, coercive warnings against union activities, and the targeting of union members were documented. Despite some measures being legally sanctioned at the time, these practices reflect an authoritarian approach to labor management that negatively impacts worker rights and undermines democratic labor relations.

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 157 F.2d 486 (8th Cir. 1946)

Montgomery Ward's refusal to adhere to labor agreements during a critical wartime period exemplifies a disregard for fair labor practices and worker rights. Their obstinacy not only forced a severe government intervention by FDR but also undermined the principles of democratic oversight in labor management, marking a negative impact in terms of ethical business practices and labor relations.

FDR seizes control of Montgomery Ward

Montgomery Ward's refusal to recognize its unions and comply with a government-mandated collective bargaining agreement in 1944 represents a significant disregard for workers' rights. This failure not only harmed labor practices but also contributed to the broader climate in which dissent and organized labor were suppressed, aligning with patterns that facilitate authoritarian and fascist practices.

Montgomery Ward - Wikipedia