Minerals Security Partnership

The Minerals Security Partnership is a collaboration of 14 countries and the European Union focused on investing in responsible, sustainable, and secure supply chains for critical minerals on a global scale.

CCI Score

27.94

-0.01% April 18

Latest Event

Minerals Security Partnership: Transition to South Korean Leadership

The Minerals Security Partnership's leadership transition from Washington to Seoul marks a strategic effort to strengthen global critical mineral supply chains and economic security. By diversifying partnerships and enhancing sustainable supply chain practices, the initiative is seen as reinforcing democratic values and reducing dependency on authoritarian suppliers.

Take Action

So what can you do? Support by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: Stantec

GFZ

Rystad
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

DISSENTER

Minerals Security Partnership is currently rated as a Dissenter.

+25 to +44 CCI Score

These companies are vocal in their opposition to authoritarian regimes. They publicly criticize oppressive policies and engage in advocacy efforts to promote accountability and transparency, even if their actions aren’t as extensive as those of Moral Leaders.

Latest Events

JAN

28

2025

Minerals Security Partnership: Transition to South Korean Leadership
37.83

The Minerals Security Partnership's leadership transition from Washington to Seoul marks a strategic effort to strengthen global critical mineral supply chains and economic security. By diversifying partnerships and enhancing sustainable supply chain practices, the initiative is seen as reinforcing democratic values and reducing dependency on authoritarian suppliers.
+30

Public and Political Behavior

March 20

The leadership transition reflects a proactive stance in engaging with democratic political frameworks. By moving the leadership baton to South Korea, the MSP signals enhanced commitment to aligning its objectives with public policy ideals that counter authoritarian influence.

The Minerals Security Partnership Under the South Korean Leadership
+40

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 20

The initiative demonstrates robust commitment to responsible supply chain practices by emphasizing sustainable sourcing and security for critical minerals. This approach not only fosters economic resilience but also upholds ethical standards that counter exploitative practices often linked to authoritarian regimes.

The Minerals Security Partnership Under the South Korean Leadership
+50

Economic and Structural Influence

March 20

The transition to South Korean leadership is positioned to enhance economic resilience by broadening international collaboration and mitigating risks associated with reliance on authoritarian suppliers. This shift is expected to improve the structural economic influence by diversifying global resource partnerships.

The Minerals Security Partnership Under the South Korean Leadership
DEC

13

2023

Minerals Security Partnership Strengthens Responsible Critical Minerals Supply Chains Amid Authoritarian Risks
57.28

The Minerals Security Partnership, a collaboration focused on responsible, sustainable, and secure supply chains for critical minerals, is highlighted in the context of U.S. foreign relations with authoritarian regimes. The analysis underscores the importance of robust supply chain ethics and cautious economic collaboration to avoid inadvertently bolstering undemocratic practices while addressing strategic vulnerabilities in critical mineral sourcing.
+70

Supply Chain Ethics

March 20

The partnership’s commitment to responsible and sustainable critical minerals supply chains is especially significant given global concerns that economic engagement with authoritarian regimes can compromise democratic values. By emphasizing ethical sourcing, the Minerals Security Partnership aims to mitigate risks associated with authoritarian influence in critical sectors, thereby promoting accountability and improved supply chain practices.

Examining U.S. Relations With Authoritarian Countries
+60

Economic Collaboration

March 20

The initiative to invest in secure and sustainable supply chains for critical minerals reflects a strategic effort to balance economic interests with ethical considerations. Given that economic collaboration with authoritarian regimes often arises from the drive to secure critical resources, the partnership’s focus helps de-risk global supply chains and supports democratic accountability by reducing dependency on regimes with poor human rights records.

Examining U.S. Relations With Authoritarian Countries
NOV

01

2022

Debate Over Minerals Security Partnership's Impact on Domestic Production and Global Investment
-11.29

A November 2022 article in Alaska Business Magazine highlights skepticism and mixed reactions towards the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP). Critics argue that the initiative, though aimed at securing supply chains for critical minerals, may inadvertently favor foreign investments over domestic production, potentially undermining high labor and environmental standards in the U.S. This debate has raised concerns among local stakeholders about economic sidelining and regulatory delays.
-10

Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

March 20

The article raises concerns regarding the MSP’s approach, suggesting that by potentially prioritizing mineral production from allied nations over domestic sources, the initiative risks compromising the American standards for labor and environmental protection. This creates uncertainty around whether high ethical standards in domestic production will be maintained or if lower standards abroad could indirectly undermine worker rights and community benefits.

The Minerals Security Partnership: More Questions than Answers
-20

Economic and Structural Influence

March 20

The article criticizes MSP for possibly leading to an increased focus on foreign mineral investments, which may weaken U.S. economic autonomy and regulatory influence. This shift could inadvertently enable international collaborations that do not adhere to the same rigorous environmental, labor, and community standards, thereby indirectly supporting structures that undermine domestic welfare.

The Minerals Security Partnership: More Questions than Answers