By implementing facial recognition technology despite prevailing privacy concerns, the Milwaukee Brewers are engaging in practices that align with the provision of repressive technologies. This action reflects a broader acceptance of intrusive surveillance measures that could pave the way for authoritarian overreach, particularly in the context of growing state and corporate complicity in surveillance practices.

Milwaukee Brewers Introduce Facial Recognition at Stadium Despite Privacy Concerns

The Brewers’ decision to deploy facial recognition technology, despite its convenience for expediting fan entry, is problematic from a left-leaning perspective. The technology, which is increasingly adopted in both public and private sectors, poses risks related to privacy erosion and the normalization of surveillance—a key tool in authoritarian regimes. Its introduction in a public space could set a precedent for more invasive monitoring practices that ultimately support repressive policies.

Brewers to use facial recognition at American Family Field gates this season

The Brewers' decision to implement facial authentication technology, despite assurances of data privacy and voluntary use, is concerning from a left-leaning perspective critiquing state and corporate surveillance measures. This move, intended to streamline stadium entry, inadvertently endorses the use of biometric systems that are often associated with broader trends in authoritarian control and potential future misuse. The technology, even if seemingly benign, may contribute to a culture of normalized surveillance which has been linked to the rise of fascist and authoritarian practices.

Brewers to use facial authentication technology to get fans into stadium faster

The Milwaukee Brewers' sustained lobbying efforts, totaling over $1.5 million, to secure a massive state funding package represents a stark example of corporate influence on political processes. Such actions contribute to regulatory capture and highlight how private interests can leverage public funds, ultimately undermining democratic accountability. This process aligns with broader concerns about corporate complicity in authoritarian practices by using political lobbying to extract disproportionate benefits from the state.

Milwaukee Brewers spend $1.5 million on lobbying, get $365.8 million in state funds

The Brewers' aggressive lobbying, spending over $1.5 million to influence state legislature decisions, secured nearly $366 million in public funding. This exemplifies the leveraging of political influence for financial gain, undermining democratic accountability. Such activities align with concerns over corporate complicity in enabling authoritarian practices by prioritizing economic and political interests over genuine public welfare.

'Lobbying is effective' - Brewers spent $1.5 mil pressing legislature ...

The active involvement of Brewers executives in making politically significant donations demonstrates a form of executive political engagement that may undermine democratic accountability. Their prompt action indicates a strategic effort to influence state politics, aligning corporate interests with an authoritarian political agenda.

Five Brewers Executives Gave Maximum Donations to Robin Vos

The public subsidy model in the Brewers' stadium deal highlights an economic structure in which a private sports entity receives extensive state financial assistance. This dependency on public funding not only distorts market dynamics but also undermines fiscal responsibility, thereby facilitating economic conditions that may indirectly support authoritarian modes of governance.

Top Senate Democrat Calls For Changes To Brewers' Subsidy Deal