Company Directory - Massachusetts Bay Company
Company Details - Massachusetts Bay Company
Massachusetts Bay Company
A chartered company established in the early 17th century that played a pivotal role in founding the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It was instrumental in promoting Puritan settlement in the New World and in shaping the early governance and cultural identity of the region.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Massachusetts Bay Company
18.55
-0.01%
Latest Event
BCG Calls for Enhanced Supply Chain Human Rights Oversight
BCG's article highlights the urgent need for companies to address human rights issues within their supply chains. It emphasizes robust labor standards and ethical sourcing practices as critical measures to deter forced labor and other human rights abuses, aligning corporate responsibilities with anti-fascist values.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
SABOTEUR
Massachusetts Bay Company is currently rated as a Saboteur.
Latest Events
- JUN272024
BCG's article highlights the urgent need for companies to address human rights issues within their supply chains. It emphasizes robust labor standards and ethical sourcing practices as critical measures to deter forced labor and other human rights abuses, aligning corporate responsibilities with anti-fascist values.
+60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 25
The article underscores the imperative of ensuring fair labor practices and upholding workers' rights in supply chains. This aligns with the need to resist systems of exploitation that can underpin authoritarian practices, and it calls for a transformation in leadership accountability.
+65
Supply Chain Ethics
March 25
The piece advocates for improved supply chain ethics as companies face growing scrutiny over sourcing practices linked to forced labor and other human rights violations. This stance is a proactive measure against enabling authoritarian practices through corporate negligence.
- MAY092024
The article outlines the rising global emphasis on addressing human rights abuses in supply chains through enhanced due diligence and compliance measures. It highlights various legislative initiatives aimed at improving transparency and accountability in supply chain ethics, which is crucial in ensuring that companies avoid complicity in human rights violations.
+70
Supply Chain Ethics
March 25
The article discusses the implementation of rigorous human rights and supply chain due diligence standards as part of global regulatory efforts. This attention to ethical sourcing and supply chain integrity is vital in preventing modern slavery and related human rights abuses. Evaluated from an anti-fascist, socially responsible perspective, strong adherence to these principles can help reduce corporate complicity in oppressive practices. Although the Massachusetts Bay Company's historical context doesn't directly align with modern supply chain operations, applying these contemporary ethical standards would warrant a positive score in supply chain ethics.
- DEC222023
The Forbes article highlights significant human rights abuses in global supply chains, emphasizing the lack of proper due diligence, transparency, and accountability in monitoring forced labor and other exploitative practices. It calls on companies to integrate human rights considerations into their corporate strategy to prevent abuses that fuel systemic oppression.
-80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 25
The article underscores severe shortcomings in supply chain ethics, particularly the failure of companies to proactively identify and mitigate human rights abuses such as forced labor and exploitation. This reflects negatively on corporate responsibility in ensuring ethical sourcing and protection of labor rights.
Human Rights In The Supply Chain: Can We Learn From Our Mistakes?
-70
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 25
The article also touches upon labor rights and human rights practices by highlighting how inadequate monitoring and enforcement contribute to worker exploitation. This reflects a broader failure in upholding labor standards, which can embolden authoritarian practices in global commerce.
Human Rights In The Supply Chain: Can We Learn From Our Mistakes?
- MAR041629
The Massachusetts Bay Company, chartered on March 4, 1629, was pivotal in establishing the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Its early governance was marked by centralized power, religious intolerance, and practices including slavery and the persecution of dissenters. Viewed through a modern anti-fascist lens, these actions can be seen as laying the groundwork for authoritarian structures that suppressed individual rights and promoted oppressive practices.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
In its establishment and political structure, the Massachusetts Bay Company imposed centralized control and religious intolerance. The enforced conformity and suppression of dissent align with authoritarian practices, reducing political pluralism and individual freedoms.
-50
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 25
The company's early business practices included participation in the slave trade and the exploitation of marginalized groups, reflecting a severe lack of ethical responsibility. These actions underpin an economic system that benefited from human rights abuses, contributing to oppressive societal structures.
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
March 25
The Massachusetts Bay Company established strong economic structures that centralized trade and resource control. This consolidation of economic power contributed to significant structural influence, aligning with tendencies of authoritarian regimes that concentrate wealth and power to maintain control.
- JAN011622
The Massachusetts Bay Company leveraged its charter privileges to institute an authoritarian and theocratic regime in colonial New England, intertwining corporate, economic, and religious power. This arrangement, as detailed in historical analysis, set a precedent for corporate complicity in oppressive governance structures.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 25
The company's deliberate manipulation of charter privileges to impose a theocratic and authoritarian system illustrates a clear use of corporate power to shape public order and political governance in favor of exclusionary practices. This historical model resonates with modern concerns about corporate facilitation of authoritarianism.
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 25
By intertwining business practices with the mechanisms of religious governance, the Massachusetts Bay Company compromised ethical responsibility. The fusion of corporate interests with a strict theocratic model created systems that suppressed dissent and marginalized nonconforming voices, aligning with authoritarian practices.
-50
Economic and Structural Influence
March 25
The use of a joint-stock company model to secure financial backing and political autonomy laid the foundation for a rigid economic structure that reinforced authoritarian governance. This structural approach contributed to centralized power and hindered equitable economic practices.
Alternatives
Corporation
0.00
Gurugram, India
12.66
Austin, United States
0.00
Charleston, United States
0.00
New Delhi, India
-6.56
Madison, USA
-44.73
Santa Fe, United States
-47.16
Corporation
51.05
Corporation
-14.45
Corporation
-20.18
Industries
- 531210
- Offices of Real Estate Agents and Brokers
- 531311
- Residential Property Managers
- 531320
- Offices of Real Estate Appraisers