Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Lucky Stores

Company Details - Lucky Stores

Lucky Stores Logo

Lucky Stores

United States

Lucky Stores is an American supermarket chain known for operating multiple grocery store brands. The brand encompasses a pair of currently operating chains as well as a defunct historical chain, making it a notable name in the history of American grocery retail.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Lucky Stores

-13.05

0.01%

Latest Event

Food Stores PAC Contributions and Influence

Data from OpenSecrets indicates that PAC contributions from the food stores industry, which likely includes Lucky Stores, have been significant in the 2023-2024 political cycle. Such contributions raise concerns about corporate political funding that may indirectly support candidates with authoritarian tendencies, thus challenging democratic accountability.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

ENABLER

Lucky Stores is currently rated as an Enabler.

-10 to -19 CCI Score
Companies in this segment facilitate authoritarian practices while claiming neutrality. They provide resources or support that indirectly bolster oppressive regimes, thereby undermining democratic accountability without overtly endorsing the regime.

Latest Events

  • Food Stores PAC Contributions and Influence Logo
    FEB
    06
    2025

    Data from OpenSecrets indicates that PAC contributions from the food stores industry, which likely includes Lucky Stores, have been significant in the 2023-2024 political cycle. Such contributions raise concerns about corporate political funding that may indirectly support candidates with authoritarian tendencies, thus challenging democratic accountability.

  • -40

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 21

    The article highlights PAC contributions by companies within the food stores industry, reflecting a practice of channeling funds to political candidates. This involvement in political contributions is problematic from an anti-authoritarian perspective, as it risks supporting policies that undermine democratic structures. Lucky Stores, as part of this sector, is potentially complicit in these practices.

    Food stores PACs contributions to candidates, 2023-2024 • OpenSecrets

  • Failed to Address Forced Labor in Tuna Supply Chains Logo
    FEB
    13
    2023

    A Greenpeace report highlights how major U.S. grocery retailers, including Lucky Stores, have not taken sufficient steps to eliminate forced labor and human rights abuses within their tuna sourcing practices.

  • -40

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 21

    Based on the Greenpeace report, Lucky Stores is implicated among major U.S. grocery retailers failing to implement adequate labor rights protections. Their lack of proactive measures to purge forced labor from the tuna supply chain reflects severe shortcomings in labor relations and human rights practices.

    New Report: 16 Biggest U.S. Grocery Retailers Failed on Forced Labor and Human Rights Abuses When Sourcing Tuna

  • -30

    Supply Chain Ethics

    March 21

    The report highlights a significant gap in the oversight of supply chain ethics at large U.S. grocers. Lucky Stores, by association with the other major retailers, appears to exhibit weak controls and transparency on sourcing practices, contributing to human rights abuses in the supply chain.

    New Report: 16 Biggest U.S. Grocery Retailers Failed on Forced Labor and Human Rights Abuses When Sourcing Tuna

  • Lucky Stores Settles Sex Bias Lawsuit Logo
    DEC
    17
    1993

    In December 1993, Lucky Stores agreed to pay nearly $108 million to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit brought by female employees, highlighting significant failures in fair labor practices and workplace equality.

  • -80

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 21

    The settlement reveals systemic gender discrimination at Lucky Stores, where female employees were routinely relegated to low-paying jobs with minimal advancement opportunities. This failure to uphold labor rights not only harmed thousands of workers but also reflects broader practices that enable oppressive and authoritarian work environments.

    Lucky Stores Agrees to Settle Sex Bias Suit : Workplace

  • Class Action Lawsuit Exposes Discriminatory Employment Practices Logo
    JAN
    01
    1992

    Lucky Stores was found by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to have violated federal and state fair employment laws in a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of women employees. The case settled for $80 million and mandated significant changes in employment practices, particularly aimed at increasing opportunities for women in management.

  • -80

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 21

    The court ruling and subsequent settlement indicate that Lucky Stores engaged in discriminatory employment practices affecting women employees, representing a significant violation of labor rights and fair employment policies. This negative outcome reflects poorly on their commitment to ethical labor relations and human rights practices and contributes to their complicity in oppressive corporate behaviors.

    Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

  • Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.: Class Action Settlement on Employment Practices Logo
    JAN
    01
    1992

    A class action lawsuit against Lucky Stores revealed discriminatory employment practices in violation of federal and state fair employment laws, resulting in an $80 million settlement and mandated changes to increase equal employment opportunities and promote gender equality.

  • -80

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 21

    The court case documented severe breaches in labor rights by Lucky Stores, with evidence of discriminatory practices that violated fair employment laws, leading to a significant settlement and enforced changes in personnel practices. This case illustrates a major failure in maintaining ethical labor relations, thereby contributing negatively to the company's complicity in authoritarian practices by perpetuating systemic inequities.

  • Discriminatory Labor Practices at Lucky Stores Logo
    APR
    22
    1988

    Documented allegations of racial, gender, and national origin discrimination in job assignments, training, and promotions in the Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc. case highlight severe labor rights violations that undermine worker protections and contribute to systemic oppression.

  • -70

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 21

    The Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc. case reveals that Lucky Stores engaged in discriminatory employment practices, negatively impacting female, Black, and Hispanic employees in critical areas such as job assignments, promotions, and training. This not only violates principles of labor rights and human dignity but also aligns with practices that can contribute to authoritarian structures by perpetuating systemic inequality.

    Case: Stender v. Lucky Stores, Inc.

Industries

424410
General Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers
445110
Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
445120
Convenience Stores