The Los Angeles Times owner publicly criticized Mayor Karen Bass for restructuring the Los Angeles Fire Department's Diversity, Equity & Inclusion bureau as part of a budget proposal, arguing that eliminating equity positions ahead of wildfire crises compromises both public safety and commitment to inclusion. This statement is seen as a stand against policies resembling anti-DEI, authoritarian rollbacks.

The Los Angeles Times has initiated a lawsuit against the City of Los Angeles, alleging that officials, including Mayor Karen Bass, unlawfully deleted text messages related to communications during the wildfire crisis. This legal action challenges the city's handling of public records and aims to safeguard governmental transparency.

The Los Angeles Times has initiated legal action against the City of Los Angeles, alleging that Mayor Karen Bass’s office deleted text messages during the Pacific Palisades wildfire crisis. The lawsuit contends that such actions undermine public access to records and set a dangerous precedent for governmental transparency.

On January 9, 2025, the Los Angeles Times published an incisive column by Michael Hiltzik that criticized anti-union tactics employed by California employers, specifically a lawsuit filed by the California Chamber of Commerce and California Restaurant Association targeting pro-worker legislation. The piece underlines the newspaper’s role in countering authoritarian employer practices and supporting robust labor rights.

Los Angeles Times published an in‐depth report on new labor laws that enhance worker protections and counter anti-union intimidation. The coverage demonstrates the paper’s commitment to progressive values and the promotion of labor rights, thus contributing positively to the resistance against authoritarian corporate practices.

The Los Angeles Times published an in-depth article on new California labor laws that enhance worker protections and promote progressive labor rights. This coverage supports democratic accountability and opposes authoritarian practices by informing the public about reforms that benefit workers.

Patrick Soon-Shiong's decision to block the Los Angeles Times's editorial board from endorsing Kamala Harris sparked a cascade of resignations and subscription cancellations, raising concerns about the manipulation of media independence and the suppression of critical editorial voices. The action raises questions about the owner’s political maneuvering and its broader implications for democratic accountability.

The resignation of the LA Times editor following the owner's decision to block the editorial board's planned endorsement of Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris has raised concerns about the newspaper's editorial independence and internal labor relations. Critics argue that such interference undermines the role of the press in holding power accountable during dangerous times for democracy.

The editor resigned after owner Patrick Soon-Shiong blocked the editorial board’s plan to endorse Vice President Kamala Harris, raising issues about corporate interference in political discourse and media independence.