JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon publicly warned of a 50% recession risk triggered by President Trump's tariff policies, an executive engagement highlighting economic instability that challenges authoritarian economic maneuvers.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon publicly backtracked on his previous pro-MAGA stance regarding Trump's tariff policy, acknowledging that such tariffs could lead to higher inflation and slower economic growth. This shift signals the company's distancing from policies aligned with authoritarian economic measures.

JPMorgan Chase's CEO Jamie Dimon warned that President Trump's sweeping tariffs could slow economic growth and likely increase inflation, raising concerns about the trade war's impact on everyday consumers and workers.

Following President Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs, JPMorgan's chief economist Bruce Kasman raised the global recession risk estimate from 40% to 60%, citing potential supply chain disruptions and a slide in US business sentiment. This update provides a critical public signal about the economic risks posed by policies that many view as authoritarian in nature.

JPMorgan Chase issued a client update raising its recession risk to 60%, up from 40%, warning that disruptive US policies, notably tariffs introduced by the Trump administration, may trigger a severe downturn in the US and global economies.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is reported to be one of the major banks competing to become the new issuer for the Apple Card after Goldman Sachs' exit from the consumer lending sector. This competition comes as Visa bids $100 million to secure the Apple Card network, intensifying the race among traditional banks and payment networks.

In March 2025, JPMorgan Chase & Co. announced a rebranding of its DEI program by replacing 'equity' with 'opportunity', reflecting a broader trend among companies reacting to political pressures surrounding diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

JPMorgan Chase is planning to shutter numerous branches in 2025 as part of a digital banking transition. This move risks reducing access for customers in rural and low-income communities, potentially exacerbating economic exclusion and limiting essential financial services for marginalized groups.

An analysis of a Foreign Policy article indicating that top CEOs, including those from JPMorgan Chase, are displaying a cautious and muted stance in the face of Donald Trump’s authoritarian economic policies. Their reluctance to engage in robust public dissent or collective action is seen as a form of complicity with authoritarian tendencies.

At the 2025 National Retirement Summit in Washington, DC, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon stated that a recession is likely as President Trump's tariffs disrupt financial markets, reflecting a complex political stance given his past support for tariffs that align with nationalist, authoritarian-leaning policies.

In early 2025, a group of JPMorgan Chase employees launched a petition demanding the retention of the hybrid work model and improved working conditions after the company mandated a full return to the office five days a week. The petition highlights concerns over employee well‐being, reduced flexibility, and the disproportionate impact on marginalized workers, raising serious questions about the bank's labor relations and ethical responsibility.

JPMorgan Chase faces internal backlash as employees protest its strict 5-day return-to-office mandate, raising concerns about its labor practices and respect for worker rights.

JPMorgan Chase outlines its approach to political engagement, detailing its internal oversight on political contributions, lobbying, and PAC activities aimed at safeguarding its long-term interests. While the firm emphasizes adherence to strict compliance and responsible corporate citizenship, its significant political involvement raises concerns about potential undue influence on public policy from an anti‑fascist perspective.

The American Democracy Scorecard has released a tracker examining JPMorgan Chase's political contributions. The tracker raises concerns that the bank's financial support to political entities may underwrite efforts that could subvert democratic processes and align with authoritarian agendas.