Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - GV

Company Details - GV

GV Logo

GV

Website

San Francisco, United States

GV is the venture capital investment arm of Alphabet Inc. It invests in technology-driven startups at early and growth stages, offering not only capital but also guidance and support to scale innovative businesses globally.

CCI Score

CCI Score: GV

-48.84

0.03%

Latest Event

Google Revises AI Ethical Policy, Eroding Commitments to Avoid Repressive Technologies

Google removed its previous promise not to use AI for weapons and surveillance in its updated ethical guidelines. This reversal signals potential complicity in enabling repressive technologies and undermining democratic values. As a key arm of Alphabet, GV is indirectly linked to these decisions, raising concerns from an anti-fascist perspective.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

QUISLING

GV is currently rated as a Quisling.

-44 to -59 CCI Score
These companies are fully aligned with authoritarian regimes. They not only support but also enforce oppressive policies, playing a significant role in the regime’s operational apparatus and contributing directly to its consolidation of power.

Latest Events

  • Google Revises AI Ethical Policy, Eroding Commitments to Avoid Repressive Technologies Logo
    FEB
    04
    2025

    Google removed its previous promise not to use AI for weapons and surveillance in its updated ethical guidelines. This reversal signals potential complicity in enabling repressive technologies and undermining democratic values. As a key arm of Alphabet, GV is indirectly linked to these decisions, raising concerns from an anti-fascist perspective.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    The policy update represents a shift in public and political behavior by erasing a commitment that once forbade the use of AI for repressive purposes such as surveillance and weaponry. This change undermines trust and signals a willingness to engage in practices that could empower authoritarian regimes.

    Google erases promise not to use AI technology for weapons or surveillance

  • -60

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 27

    By abandoning its ethical commitment regarding AI applications, the company demonstrates a disregard for business practices and ethical responsibility. This policy reversal suggests that profit and competitive positioning may be prioritized over human rights and ethical considerations.

    Google erases promise not to use AI technology for weapons or surveillance

  • -75

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    The removal of restrictions on developing technology for weapons and surveillance has a profound negative impact on society. It underscores a dangerous shift in technological practices, where advancements could be weaponized to further oppressive agendas.

    Google erases promise not to use AI technology for weapons or surveillance

  • -30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 27

    While primarily a policy and ethical issue, this shift could have broader economic and structural implications by normalizing practices that indirectly support repressive regimes. The long-term impacts on market dynamics and regulatory environments may further entrench authoritarian influence.

    Google erases promise not to use AI technology for weapons or surveillance

  • Alphabet's Military AI Policy Reversal and Repressive Practices Logo
    FEB
    01
    2025

    In February 2025, Alphabet (parent company of GV) lifted its ban on utilizing its AI tools for military purposes, enabling technology for repressive measures including surveillance and potential weaponization. The decision, along with ethically questionable contract modifications and retaliation against protesting employees, raises significant concerns about the company’s complicity in authoritarian practices.

  • -80

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    Alphabet’s reversal of its ban on military applications of AI directly supports authoritarian military agendas. This decision, along with documented retaliation against employees who protested the misuse of technology, illustrates a concerning trend in public and political behavior that undermines democratic norms.

    Alphabet Inc | AFSC Investigate - American Friends Service Committee

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 27

    Contract modifications that eliminated ethical safeguards and misleading public statements regarding service terms demonstrate problematic business practices. Prioritizing revenue from defense contracts over human rights and ethical responsibility contributes to systemic abuses.

    Alphabet Inc | AFSC Investigate - American Friends Service Committee

  • -85

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    The provision of advanced AI and cloud computing services that are directly applied to military surveillance and potentially lethal operations underscores a troubling use of technology. These actions enable oppressive regimes and contribute to large-scale human rights violations.

    Alphabet Inc | AFSC Investigate - American Friends Service Committee

  • -60

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 27

    The economic arrangements, including inflexible contract clauses that prevent withdrawal and ensure continued financial benefit from defense contracts, create structural dependencies that fortify authoritarian agendas. This economic collaboration indirectly supports regimes involved in human rights abuses.

    Alphabet Inc | AFSC Investigate - American Friends Service Committee

  • Alphabet Inc. AI Dominance and Regulatory Challenges Logo
    DEC
    29
    2024

    The article details Alphabet's leadership in AI, its expansive integration of technology across platforms, and growing regulatory scrutiny regarding antitrust and market dominance. These developments may indirectly contribute to mechanisms that undermine democratic accountability.

  • -30

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 27

    The article highlights regulatory challenges and antitrust scrutiny over Alphabet’s monopolistic practices, which reflect a concerning level of political and public behavior. Such dynamics can erode democratic processes by fostering undue corporate influence in political and regulatory arenas.

    Alphabet Inc. (Google): AI Leadership and Regulatory Risks

  • -10

    Technology and Services Impact

    March 27

    Alphabet’s aggressive integration of AI into its ecosystem, while innovative, poses risks related to surveillance and the erosion of privacy. From an anti-fascist perspective, such technological deployments may be exploited to consolidate power and undermine individual freedoms.

    Alphabet Inc. (Google): AI Leadership and Regulatory Risks

  • -30

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 27

    The article brings attention to economic and structural influences, particularly through antitrust investigations and regulatory capture. Alphabet’s entrenched market position and economic collaboration with powerful stakeholders could be seen as undermining competitive markets and democratic oversight.

    Alphabet Inc. (Google): AI Leadership and Regulatory Risks

  • GV’s Political Contributions and Influence in Venture Capital Logo
    MAR
    20
    2023

    Data from OpenSecrets indicates that venture capital firms, including GV, play a significant role as donors in U.S. political campaigns. Such political contributions raise concerns about disproportionate influence in shaping policies that may favor authoritarian agendas.

  • -50

    Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts

    March 27

    OpenSecrets data highlights that venture capital firms are major players in political contributions, which can result in undue influence over legislative and regulatory processes. GV’s involvement in politically financing campaigns and interest groups is seen as a contribution to the undermining of democratic institutions, potentially enabling authoritarian practices. This negative score reflects concerns over the use of private wealth to sway public policy in ways that may benefit authoritarian agendas.

    Venture Capital Top Contributors • OpenSecrets

  • GV Investment Ethics and Human Rights Due Diligence Concerns Logo
    JUL
    30
    2021

    An Amnesty International report revealed that top venture capital firms often lack rigorous human rights due diligence processes, a gap that may indirectly enable human rights abuses such as forced labor and state oppression. As a VC firm, GV is implicated in this broader industry trend of failing to critically assess the ethical ramifications of their investments.

  • -70

    Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility

    March 27

    GV, as a leading venture capital firm, is part of an industry criticized for not implementing sufficient human rights due diligence processes. The lack of checks in investments has broader societal implications, as these funds may contribute to enabling companies that are directly or indirectly linked to human rights abuses. This negligence supports patterns of unethical business practices and indirectly facilitates the rise of authoritarian practices by overlooking abuses in supply chains and surveillance tech usage.

    Top Venture Capital Firms Complicit In Human Rights Abuses