The Supreme Court is set to review First Choice Women’s Resource Centers v. Platkin, a case highlighting allegations that the crisis pregnancy center employed misleading websites to obscure its pro-life agenda and deceive donors and patients, raising serious ethical concerns.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear First Choice Women’s Resource Centers' appeal against New Jersey's investigation into allegations that the center misled women into believing it offered abortions. The center argues that the inquiry violates their constitutional rights by forcing disclosure of donor identities, a move they say is damaging their ability to attract donations and advertise services.

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear First Choice Women’s Resource Centers' challenge against New Jersey's investigation into whether the centers misled women by implying they offered abortions. The centers argue that the state’s subpoena to reveal donor information and internal communications violates their constitutional rights, a stance that critics contend is designed to shield opaque donor networks and political influence from regulatory oversight.

On June 16, 2025, the Supreme Court agreed to hear First Choice Women's Resource Centers' legal challenge against a New Jersey state subpoena that demands donor information and internal communications. The challenge asserts that the state is using its investigative powers in a politically motivated manner, while critics argue that such legal maneuvers obstruct accountability and transparency regarding potential misleading practices about abortion service availability.