Company Directory - Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC)
Company Details - Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC)

Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC)
WebsiteWashington, D.C., United States
1 Locations
A conservative think tank that focuses on promoting principles and policies consistent with a public philosophy that upholds life and traditional values.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC)
-34.07
0.11%
Latest Event
EPPC Publishes Controversial Abortion Pill Safety Report
The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) released a non–peer-reviewed report in late April 2025 claiming that abortion pills have significantly higher complication rates than previously indicated, a claim widely disputed by reproductive health experts. The report is being used by anti-abortion activists to justify efforts to restrict access to mifepristone.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- APR302025
The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) released a non–peer-reviewed report in late April 2025 claiming that abortion pills have significantly higher complication rates than previously indicated, a claim widely disputed by reproductive health experts. The report is being used by anti-abortion activists to justify efforts to restrict access to mifepristone.
- NOV142024
EPPC's Administrative State Accountability Project, led by Attorney Rachel N. Morrison, seeks to challenge the federal regulatory apparatus—referred to as the 'deep state'—by opposing liberal regulatory practices in favor of traditional Judeo-Christian values.
-60
Executive Political Engagement
May 9
The project represents an active engagement by EPPC in political advocacy that aims to delegitimize the regulatory mechanisms of the federal government. By framing the administrative state as a 'deep state' and targeting liberal regulations, the initiative promotes a conservative agenda that may undermine essential democratic checks and protections. From an anti-fascist, left-leaning perspective, this approach raises concerns about reinforcing exclusionary and authoritarian narratives.
- NOV012024
EPPC’s Administrative State Accountability Project, directed by Rachel N. Morrison, engages in the federal rulemaking process through public comments, meetings with officials, and filing amicus briefs. The initiative seeks to influence agency actions in line with traditional values and a conservative interpretation of human rights, potentially sidelining progressive policy reforms.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
May 9
EPPC leverages lobbying tactics by submitting detailed public comments and engaging with government officials to shape regulatory policies. From an anti-fascist perspective, such strategic use of political contributions and lobbying can help promote a narrow, conservative agenda that risks undermining inclusive, progressive reforms.
-50
Executive Political Engagement
May 9
By actively engaging in the rulemaking process and filing amicus briefs, EPPC’s leadership demonstrates significant executive political engagement. This effort, while claiming to enhance accountability, advances a conservative, traditionalist agenda that may impede progressive policy developments and the defense of marginalized communities.
- MAY012024
The 2023 Annual Report from the Ethics and Public Policy Center reinforces its conservative ideological stance by affirming Western ethical imperatives and emphasizing the need to expose a 'radical progressive agenda'. The report outlines its commitment to shaping public discourse in line with traditional American values, a politically charged message that, from an anti-fascist perspective, may indirectly contribute to polarizing narratives in a tense political climate.
-10
Public and Political Behavior
May 9
The report’s explicit political messaging—calling to expose a 'radical progressive agenda' while championing traditional Western ethical imperatives—illustrates an engagement in politically motivated communications. From an anti-fascist perspective, such messaging can be seen as contributing to ideological polarization and may indirectly bolster authoritarian-leaning narratives in a charged political environment.
- APR182024
On April 18, 2024, EPPC Fellow Rachel N. Morrison met with officials in the Executive Office of the President to express concerns over the EEOC’s proposed guidance on workplace harassment, which would include protections for issues related to reproductive decisions and gender identity. Morrison argued that the guidance oversteps statutory authority and undermines established legal protections, a stance that critics say may weaken safeguards for marginalized communities.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
May 9
By meeting with federal officials to oppose the EEOC’s expanded harassment guidance—which includes protections for reproductive decisions and gender identity expressions—EPPC’s representative is engaging in political advocacy aimed at curtailing progressive labor and civil rights protections. This effort, seen as an attempt to roll back measures that protect marginalized groups, earns a negative score, reflecting its potential to undermine community inclusivity and worker rights.
- OCT012023
EPPC has launched its Technology and Human Flourishing Project aimed at exploring the dual impacts of modern technology on human dignity. The initiative seeks to protect children and families from the harms of social media and online pornography, while also challenging Big Tech’s censorship practices. The project works closely with policymakers, scholars, and civil society leaders to develop robust policy solutions.
+40
Executive Political Engagement
May 9
EPPC’s project actively engages with lawmakers and policymakers by convening diverse coalitions to address digital harms. The involvement of figures with governmental advisory experience (e.g., Clare Morell’s past with the Attorney General’s commission) indicates a solid commitment to shaping public policy in a way that promotes accountability and safeguards public interests, aligning with anti-authoritarian principles.
Technology and Human Flourishing Project - Ethics & Public Policy Center
+35
Technology and Services Impact
May 9
By addressing issues such as Big Tech’s censorship, online exploitation, and the harmful impacts of digital content, EPPC’s project contributes to a critical assessment of technology’s role in society. The initiative seeks to harness the benefits of technological innovation while mitigating its risks, thereby promoting human flourishing and digital accountability.
Technology and Human Flourishing Project - Ethics & Public Policy Center
- JAN012023
The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) published an extensive op‐ed titled 'In Search of Authority' in Winter 2023, authored by Brad Littlejohn. The piece examines the crisis of political authority and critiques the abdication of decision-making in favor of overly technocratic approaches. It calls for a return to decisive, traditional leadership—a stance that some may interpret as bolstering authoritarian practices by valuing top‐down command over more participatory democratic norms.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 9
The op-ed promotes a conception of authority that emphasizes centralized, decisive decision-making and aligns with traditional hierarchical leadership. This explicit valorization of strong political authority—implicitly admiring figures like Trump and Elon Musk for their assertiveness—can be read as indirectly endorsing authoritarian approaches, thereby negatively impacting EPPC’s standing on the Public and Political Behavior category.
- NOV282022
On November 28, 2022, EPPC published an opinion piece titled 'Authoritarianism Without Authority' that critiques scientism and the public's compliant response during the COVID-19 response, arguing that blind adherence to 'science' fosters authoritarianism. The article frames dissent as essential and critiques progressive policies, reflecting a conservative ideological stance that may undermine efforts to protect marginalized groups and worker rights.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 9
The opinion piece reflects a conservative political stance by promoting traditional values and critiquing progressive policies. Through its framing of scientism as inherently totalitarian and its valorization of dissent against established norms, the publication may contribute to a political narrative that dismisses marginalized voices and worker rights, aligning with authoritarian-leaning ideologies from an anti-fascist viewpoint.
- JUN012021
In 2021, EPPC initiated its Big Tech Project aimed at challenging major technology companies. The project seeks to revise Section 230, expose alleged antitrust violations, and highlight claims of censorship by Big Tech, thereby influencing the debate on technology regulation from a conservative perspective.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
May 9
The Big Tech Project represents a strategic effort by EPPC to politicize technology regulation. By advocating for changes to Section 230 and accusing Big Tech of censorship and antitrust violations, the project reinforces a right-of-center agenda that may undermine balanced public discourse and bolster authoritarian narratives.
- FEB012021
In February 2021, the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) launched its HHS Accountability Project to oppose the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate, advocate for regulatory reform at HHS, and defend religious and conscience protections. This politically charged initiative aims to reshape public policy according to conservative and traditional values.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
May 9
The HHS Accountability Project is a politically motivated initiative designed to challenge public health measures by opposing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. By seeking to reform HHS regulations in favor of conservative, religious-based values, EPPC is engaging in public and political behavior that can contribute to undermining progressive public health policies and democratic norms.
Alternatives

Los Angeles, United States
69.26

Vancouver, Canada
68.56

Corporation
66.95

Corporation
65.69

Corporation
60.61

Corporation
60.00

United States
71.13

Norfolk, United States
60.43
Redwood City, United States
58.61

Washington, D.C., United States
53.58
Industries
- 541820
- Public Relations Agencies
- 813312
- Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations
- 813319
- Other Social Advocacy Organizations