Company Directory

Company Directory

Company Directory - Department of Education

Company Details - Department of Education

Department of Education Logo

Department of Education

Website

Washington, United States

The U.S. Department of Education is a federal government agency responsible for establishing policies on federal financial aid for education, collecting data on America's schools, focusing national attention on key educational issues, and ensuring equal access to education.

CCI Score

CCI Score: Department of Education

-37.99

0.02%

Latest Event

DOE Enforces Trump DEI Mandate in Schools

The U.S. Department of Education has given states and school districts until April 24 to certify compliance with Trump's mandate to strip all DEI policies, using federal funding as leverage to enforce conformity. A Department spokesperson emphasized that federal funding is contingent upon adherence to these requirements, effectively sidelining diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL
Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Department of Education is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score
Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

  • DOE Enforces Trump DEI Mandate in Schools Logo
    APR
    10
    2025

    The U.S. Department of Education has given states and school districts until April 24 to certify compliance with Trump's mandate to strip all DEI policies, using federal funding as leverage to enforce conformity. A Department spokesperson emphasized that federal funding is contingent upon adherence to these requirements, effectively sidelining diversity and inclusion initiatives.

  • Department of Education Impacted by Controversial Budget Cuts Logo
    APR
    06
    2025

    Amid widespread protests against Trump administration’s reform efforts, the Department of Education has been affected by aggressive cost‐cutting measures. Ranking second on the Agency Efficiency Leaderboard, the department has faced severe reductions that protesters argue undermine support for teachers and marginalized communities.

  • Department of Education Enforces Title IX Compliance in Maine Logo
    APR
    01
    2025

    The U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to the Maine Department of Education, issuing a final deadline of April 11 for addressing trans athlete policy issues under Title IX. Failure to comply may result in a referral to the Department of Justice, reflecting a strong federal effort to enforce civil rights and protect marginalized groups.

  • Trump Administration’s Closure of Department of Education: Impact on Low-Income Schools Logo
    MAR
    21
    2025

    President Trump's executive action to shutter the Department of Education, including drastic workforce cuts and potential disruption of Title I and REAP funding, reflects a politically motivated move that could harm low-income and rural schools, undermining educational equity and the structural role of federal oversight.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 22

    The executive directive to close the Department of Education and lay off the majority of NCES staff illustrates a concerning use of political power that sidelines educational equity. This move, aligned with authoritarian policy shifts, erodes public accountability and jeopardizes the federal role in ensuring fair distribution of educational resources, especially for vulnerable low-income and rural communities.

    How the Education Department cuts could hurt low-income and rural schools

  • -60

    Economic and Structural Influence

    March 22

    The deep cuts and planned layoffs at the NCES compromise the Department’s ability to manage and distribute federal funds effectively. This economic shake-up threatens the structural integrity of educational funding, disproportionately affecting schools serving disadvantaged communities, and reflects an economic reorganization that could have long-term damaging impacts.

    How the Education Department cuts could hurt low-income and rural schools

  • Dismantling of the Department of Education via Executive Order Logo
    MAR
    21
    2025

    In an executive order signed by President Donald Trump on 2025-03-21, key functions of the Department of Education—such as administration of student loans, special needs programs, and nutrition services—were transferred to the SBA and HHS. The agency, under pressure, stated it would 'close the bureaucracy responsibly' while ensuring continued support for affected students. From an anti‐fascist perspective, this act of compliance and restructuring raises concerns over the degradation of public institutions critical to safeguarding equitable access to education, potentially aiding authoritarian consolidation by weakening federal oversight.

  • Department of Education Workforce Reduction Plan Under Fire Logo
    MAR
    13
    2025

    On March 13, 2025, a lawsuit was filed by 21 state attorneys general alleging that the Department of Education's drastic reduction in workforce is part of an effort to dismantle the agency, an action seen as undermining democratic accountability and employee rights. Critics argue that this move under the Trump administration reflects a broader trend to subvert constitutional mandates and erode civil rights protections.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 22

    The workforce reduction plan led by the Department of Education, under directive from the Trump administration, is viewed as a politically driven maneuver aimed at weakening a vital public institution. This undermines democratic accountability and supports an authoritarian agenda by intentionally diminishing the agency's capacity to safeguard educational and civil rights.

    States Sue Over Department of Education's Workforce Reduction Plan

  • -50

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 22

    The drastic reduction in workforce not only disrupts the operational capacity of the Department but also undermines the rights and protections of its employees. By targeting a core element of the institution essential for enforcing civil rights and ensuring transparency, the policy reflects a broader strategy that could facilitate authoritarian control and erode public service delivery.

    States Sue Over Department of Education's Workforce Reduction Plan

  • Department of Education Workforce Reduction Raises Labor and Political Concerns Logo
    MAR
    11
    2025

    The U.S. Department of Education initiated a reduction in force affecting nearly 50% of its workforce. The move, justified under a banner of efficiency and accountability, employs politically charged rhetoric to frame drastic cuts as a step toward 'restoring the greatness' of the education system, raising serious concerns about the undermining of worker rights and the politicization of public services.

  • -40

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 22

    The Department’s public messaging using phrases like 'restoring the greatness' of the U.S. education system in the context of massive workforce cuts reflects a politicized approach that aligns with authoritarian rhetoric. This politicization undermines democratic engagement and raises concerns over the use of efficiency as a cover for reducing public workforce, negatively impacting public trust.

    U.S. Department of Education Initiates Reduction in Force

  • -70

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 22

    The drastic reduction in force, affecting nearly half of the Department’s workforce, poses serious labor rights concerns. The strategy of placing affected employees on administrative leave while touting efficiency undermines worker security and signals a disregard for the human and social costs of such cuts.

    U.S. Department of Education Initiates Reduction in Force

  • Department of Education Workforce Reduction and Its Implications Logo
    MAR
    11
    2025

    On March 11th, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced a reduction in force that slashes nearly half of the Department's workforce, including significant cuts to the Office for Civil Rights and the Institutes for Education Sciences. This drastic restructuring raises concerns about diminished oversight and reduced capacity to protect civil rights and enforce fair labor practices.

  • -30

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 22

    The decision to drastically reduce the workforce, including key divisions like the Office for Civil Rights, signals a disturbing trend in public management. Such actions can be perceived as politically driven measures that weaken essential checks on civil rights enforcement, thereby indirectly facilitating environments where authoritarian practices could proliferate.

    Education Department Slashes Workforce in Half

  • -40

    Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices

    March 22

    The large-scale layoffs, which affect not only administrative roles but also critical civil rights enforcement and independent research functions, undermine labor relations and human rights practices. This reduction diminishes the agency’s ability to safeguard employee rights and effectively address discrimination and civil rights violations, potentially weakening protections against systemic oppression.

    Education Department Slashes Workforce in Half

  • U.S. Department of Education Cuts $600 Million in Divisive Teacher Training Grants Logo
    FEB
    17
    2025

    The U.S. Department of Education terminated over $600 million in grants from teacher training programs that incorporated progressive content such as Critical Race Theory, DEI, anti-racism, and social justice, a move viewed by left-leaning critics as undermining essential educational initiatives that help combat authoritarianism.

  • -70

    Public and Political Behavior

    March 22

    The decision to cut substantial funding for teacher training programs that focused on anti-racist and progressive topics is seen as a politically charged move that undermines efforts to equip educators to challenge systemic oppression and authoritarian narratives. From an anti-fascist perspective, removing support for curricula that promote critical engagement on issues of race, diversity, and social justice may inadvertently enable far-right ideologies to gain ground.

    U.S. Department of Education Cuts Over $600 Million in Divisive Teacher Training Grants

Industries

611110
Elementary and Secondary Schools
611310
Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
611699
All Other Miscellaneous Schools and Instruction