Deep Packet Inspection Consortium

The Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) Consortium offers patent help, resources, and more to document the history of this key technology.

CCI Score

-30.46

0.02% April 18

Latest Event

Coverage of DPI Abuse: Implications for Repressive Technologies

The article details the use of Deep Packet Inspection as a tool for mass surveillance, censorship, and data manipulation by authoritarian regimes—particularly as implemented by China. While the Deep Packet Inspection Consortium documents the history of this technology, its indirect association with DPI raises concerns about normalizing a tool that can be exploited to undermine democratic freedoms.

Take Action

So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?

Shop Alternatives SEE ALL: Recorded Future

Fortinet

Palo Alto Networks
Use Your Voice OTHER TOOLS
Investigate
Share the Score SUPPORT CCI

TOADIE

Deep Packet Inspection Consortium is currently rated as a Toadie.

-30 to -44 CCI Score

Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

Latest Events

FEB

25

2025

Coverage of DPI Abuse: Implications for Repressive Technologies
-39.43

The article details the use of Deep Packet Inspection as a tool for mass surveillance, censorship, and data manipulation by authoritarian regimes—particularly as implemented by China. While the Deep Packet Inspection Consortium documents the history of this technology, its indirect association with DPI raises concerns about normalizing a tool that can be exploited to undermine democratic freedoms.
-40

Technology and Services Impact

March 27

The article highlights how Deep Packet Inspection, the subject matter documented by the consortium, is deployed by authoritarian regimes for surveillance, censorship, and manipulation. By maintaining resources and a historical record of DPI technology, the consortium may inadvertently contribute to a normalization of technology that facilitates repressive measures. This negative rating under the 'Technology and Services Impact' category reflects the growing concerns that such technologies undermine privacy, free speech, and democracy.

Deep Packet Inspection and How China Uses It To Persecute Its People
MAY

04

2023

Deep Packet Inspection Consortium and Repressive Surveillance Technologies
-32.88

The article highlights the role of Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) technology as a tool for surveillance and censorship used by authoritarian regimes. By providing patent support and resources for DPI, the consortium is indirectly linked to technologies that can be employed to undermine democratic rights and enable repression.
-40

Provision of Repressive Technologies

March 27

The consortium's involvement with DPI technology, which is widely documented as a tool for repressive surveillance and censorship, raises serious concerns. The article outlines how DPI is used by authoritarian governments to control information and monitor citizens. While the consortium's stated mission is to document the history of DPI, its support for the technology indirectly contributes to its proliferation in repressive contexts.

A new anti-democratic tool: The Deep Packet Inspection technique
NOV

06

2013

Deep Packet Inspection Consortium and the Provision of Repressive Technologies
-19.08

The DPI Consortium, which supports and documents the history of deep packet inspection technology, is linked to practices that can enable surveillance, censorship, and intrusive data monitoring. This association raises concerns about bolstering authoritarian measures that undermine democratic transparency, as discussed in an analysis of DPI’s role in enabling state and corporate surveillance.
-60

Technology and Services Impact

March 27

Deep packet inspection technology has been widely criticized for its capacity to support repressive surveillance measures and censorship. By promoting and supporting DPI technology, the consortium is indirectly complicit in creating tools that can be used to monitor, restrict, and control public communication, thereby potentially aiding authoritarian practices. This rating reflects the negative impact such technological support can have on democratic institutions and personal freedoms.

The Politics of Deep Packet Inspection: What Drives Surveillance by Internet Service Providers?