Company Directory - Aurora
Company Details - Aurora
Aurora
A robotics company that focuses on developing self-driving technology for vehicles.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Aurora
-31.06
0.03%
Latest Event
Aurora Innovation Appeals Federal Ruling on Safety Triangle Exemption
Aurora Innovation has filed a legal appeal against a federal ruling that rejected its request for a safety exemption, signaling an effort to reshape regulatory standards in favor of deregulation that may undermine public safety.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
TOADIE
Aurora is currently rated as a Toadie.
Latest Events
- JAN162025
Aurora Innovation has filed a legal appeal against a federal ruling that rejected its request for a safety exemption, signaling an effort to reshape regulatory standards in favor of deregulation that may undermine public safety.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
Aurora's appeal against the federal ruling is a clear instance of the company engaging in public political behavior aimed at altering safety regulations. This strategic move prioritizes corporate interest and deregulation, potentially compromising public safety, and reflects broader efforts that align with policies favoring reduced oversight.
Aurora Innovation Appeals Federal Ruling on Safety Triangle Exemption for Self-Driving Trucks
-30
Economic and Structural Influence
March 26
By challenging established safety regulations, Aurora is attempting to influence the regulatory framework to better serve its business interests. This legal strategy not only undermines regulatory oversight but also contributes to an economic structure that favors corporate power over consumer and public welfare.
Aurora Innovation Appeals Federal Ruling on Safety Triangle Exemption for Self-Driving Trucks
- JAN142025
Aurora Innovation has taken federal safety regulators to court over longstanding safety rules as it nears the launch of its self-driving truck service. The legal challenge aims to secure exemptions from established safety protocols, a move that may undermine public oversight and ethical business practices in favor of deregulation.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
Aurora's decision to challenge federal safety regulations reflects a contentious use of political influence. By pursuing a legal exemption from safety standards originally designed to protect the public, the company aligns its interests with deregulation efforts that could weaken oversight and accountability, echoing themes of corporate political behavior that favor profit over safety.
Aurora takes feds to court over safety rules as it nears self-driving truck launch
-30
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 26
By contesting established safety rules, Aurora demonstrates business practices that may prioritize rapid technological deployment over ethical responsibility and worker/public safety. The legal maneuver raises questions about the company’s commitment to upholding rigorous safety standards in a highly regulated industry.
Aurora takes feds to court over safety rules as it nears self-driving truck launch
-20
Technology and Services Impact
March 26
The push to deploy self-driving technology through exemptions from conventional safety measures raises concerns about the impacts of emerging technologies on public safety. Aurora’s legal challenge suggests a willingness to sidestep established norms in favor of rapid innovation, which could compromise technological safety guarantees.
Aurora takes feds to court over safety rules as it nears self-driving truck launch
- JAN112025
Aurora Innovation Inc. has legally challenged a US safety ruling that mandates traditional emergency safety devices on self-driving trucks, a move viewed as an attempt to undermine regulatory oversight designed to protect public and worker safety.
-30
Public and Political Behavior
March 26
By challenging the US transportation regulator’s ruling on mandated safety devices, Aurora is engaging in a public confrontation that undermines established safety protections. This legal maneuver can be interpreted as a broader attempt to weaken institutional oversight, signaling corporate resistance to public regulation meant to ensure transparency and safety.
Aurora Fights US Ruling on Self-Driving Truck Hazard Warnings
-20
Regulatory Capture
March 26
Aurora's legal filing against a regulatory decision exemplifies an effort to influence regulatory processes in favor of corporate flexibility, which may contribute to a weakening of public oversight and accountability. This maneuver fits within a broader context of regulatory capture, where corporate interests override protective public policies.
Aurora Fights US Ruling on Self-Driving Truck Hazard Warnings
- DEC312024
Aurora Innovation reported $98,656 in political contributions and spent $510,000 on lobbying in 2024. The firm's reliance on a revolving door of lobbyists—where 4 out of 6 lobbyists have previously held government positions—raises serious concerns about its influence on democratic processes and potential support for authoritarian policies.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 26
Aurora Innovation’s spending of $510,000 on lobbying in 2024, coupled with a political contribution of $98,656, indicates active investment in influencing political processes. This activity, alongside the use of former government officials as lobbyists, suggests a strategic alignment with policies that may undermine democratic checks and balance, potentially favoring authoritarian practices.
-30
Executive Political Engagement
March 26
The revolving door phenomenon, where 4 out of 6 lobbyists previously served in government roles, is indicative of deep-seated executive political engagement. This practice can facilitate undue corporate influence on policymaking, further eroding democratic accountability and potentially bolstering authoritarian agendas.