Company Directory - Association of Tennis Professionals
Company Details - Association of Tennis Professionals
Association of Tennis Professionals
WebsiteThe ATP is the governing body of the men's professional tennis circuits. It is responsible for organizing tournaments, maintaining player rankings, and promoting the sport on a global scale.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Association of Tennis Professionals
-59.76
Latest Event
ATP Faces Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Cartel Practices in Professional Tennis
A lawsuit filed by the Professional Tennis Players' Association accuses the ATP and other governing bodies of operating as a cartel, exercising excessive control over players' pay and working conditions, and stifling fair competition and labor rights in the sport.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
QUISLING
Association of Tennis Professionals is currently rated as a Quisling.
Latest Events
- MAR192025
A lawsuit filed by the Professional Tennis Players' Association accuses the ATP and other governing bodies of operating as a cartel, exercising excessive control over players' pay and working conditions, and stifling fair competition and labor rights in the sport.
-60
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 20
The lawsuit highlights allegations that ATP exercises a monopoly-like control over players' wages and working conditions, resembling exploitative labor practices. This concentration of power undermines fair labor standards and reflects a centralized, authoritarian approach to managing player relations.
Professional players' group likens tennis organizers to a 'cartel' in its lawsuit
-40
Regulatory Capture
March 20
The antitrust lawsuit suggests that ATP's monopolistic practices limit competition and consolidate power, thereby reinforcing a centralized and coercive structure. Such economic control mirrors aspects of regulatory capture where dominant organizations set conditions that disadvantage fair market competition and equitable treatment.
Professional players' group likens tennis organizers to a 'cartel' in its lawsuit
- MAR182025
Professional tennis players have filed lawsuits alleging that ATP and affiliated bodies operate as a cartel to exploit player talent by suppressing earnings, jeopardizing health, and limiting competition. The legal action highlights concerns over labor rights and fair revenue sharing in professional tennis.
-40
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 20
The lawsuits allege that ATP's practices exploit players by suppressing earnings, compromising health and safety, and creating an unfair competitive environment. Such practices are indicative of a failure in upholding labor rights and fair business practices, thereby contributing to broader patterns of exploitation and monopolistic control which align with authoritarian economic behaviors.
- MAR182025
The Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) has initiated legal actions against ATP and other governing bodies, alleging systemic collusion, suppression of player earnings, and exploitative labor practices that compromise player health and financial well‐being.
-85
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 20
The article details how ATP, as one of tennis’ governing bodies, has been implicated in practices that compromise player rights and welfare. Allegations include enforcing exploitative labor conditions, suppressing prize money, and neglecting player health and safety standards. Such behavior aligns with a severe breach in labor relations and human rights practices, undermining the fair treatment of professional athletes.
-75
Economic Collaboration
March 20
The legal actions also shine a light on economic collusion and anti-competitive practices orchestrated by ATP. By limiting competition, fixing prize money, and enforcing monopolistic controls, ATP is accused of engaging in economic collaboration that undermines free-market fairness and exploits players financially. This behavior demonstrates a form of regulatory capture that bolsters authoritarian control over the sport.
- MAR182025
A recent antitrust lawsuit filed by the Professional Tennis Players Association (PTPA) accuses the ATP of exploiting players through unfair prize money distribution and monopolistic practices that undermine competitive fairness and worker rights.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 20
The lawsuit alleges that ATP has fostered an environment where players, treated as independent contractors, are effectively exploited. The complaint highlights low prize money shares, poor compensation relative to revenues, and restrictive policies that diminish athletes’ rights. This reflects severe shortcomings in labor relations and human rights practices, contributing negatively to the company’s complicity in systemic exploitation.
Tennis lawsuit by PTPA explained: What it means for players, ATP, WTA and tournaments
-60
Regulatory Capture
March 20
The lawsuit also points to regulatory capture, with ATP and allied bodies engaging in monopolistic practices that restrict competition and consolidate power. By imposing strict controls over player compensation and tournament regulations, ATP contributes to a system where regulatory capture undermines fair play and democratic practices in sports governance.
Tennis lawsuit by PTPA explained: What it means for players, ATP, WTA and tournaments
- FEB282024
The Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) has entered into a 5-year, $100 million partnership with the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), a move that has raised concerns about legitimizing authoritarian regimes and sportswashing. Critics argue this deal provides political cover and economic support to a regime with a problematic human rights record, potentially compromising ATP’s integrity.
-50
Public and Political Behavior
March 20
The ATP’s decision to partner with the Saudi PIF signals a troubling endorsement of a regime known for its authoritarian practices. By aligning with a state-controlled investment fund linked to a record of human rights abuses, ATP risks normalizing political influence from authoritarian actors, thereby undermining public trust and democratic norms.
For a glimpse into golf's Saudi-backed future, look at tennis
-80
Economic and Structural Influence
March 20
By entering into a multi-million dollar agreement with the Saudi PIF, ATP becomes economically intertwined with a regime known for its authoritarian practices. This economic collaboration not only provides financial benefits but also risks endorsing and normalizing the influence of regimes that undermine democratic values and commit systemic human rights abuses.
For a glimpse into golf's Saudi-backed future, look at tennis
- FEB282024
The ATP's multi‐year strategic partnership with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund has drawn criticism for enabling sportswashing and legitimizing an authoritarian regime with a record of human rights abuses. Critics argue that by striking this deal, the ATP has ignored calls for human rights due diligence and transparency in its business practices.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 20
The ATP’s announcement to partner with the Saudi Public Investment Fund reflects a problematic political alignment, implicitly endorsing an authoritarian regime without addressing its record on repression and human rights violations.
-70
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 20
The ATP has demonstrated a lack of ethical responsibility by entering into a strategic partnership without implementing measures to safeguard or address the severe human rights concerns associated with its authoritarian partner.
-80
Economic and Structural Influence
March 20
By aligning with the Saudi Public Investment Fund, the ATP has engaged in economic collaboration that indirectly bolsters a regime known for its systematic human rights violations and authoritarian practices, thereby impacting broader economic and structural dynamics.
- FEB152024
The ATP's multi‐year strategic partnership with Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund has prompted criticism, as it aligns the organization with a regime widely associated with human rights abuses and authoritarian practices. Critics argue that this collaboration effectively contributes to sportswashing, undermining the fight against fascism and repression.
-70
Economic and Structural Influence
March 20
ATP’s decision to enter into a multi‐year strategic partnership with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund links it with a regime that has a documented record of authoritarian governance and human rights abuses. This economic collaboration supports sportswashing initiatives and reflects complicity in endorsing repressive policies, thereby undermining ethical corporate practices and contributing to the broader rise of authoritarianism.
Alternatives
Corporation
44.48
Corporation
-29.95
Miami, United States
78.53
Denver, United States
74.71
Birmingham, United States
66.07
Southampton, England
65.93
Florence, Italy
63.39
Philadelphia, United States
62.97
Marseille, France
61.40
Arlington, USA
59.59
Industries
- 711211
- Sports Teams and Clubs
- 711219
- Other Spectator Sports
- 813920
- Professional Organizations