Company Directory - Apple TV+
Company Details - Apple TV+
Apple TV+
Apple TV+ is a streaming service featuring original TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It provides exclusive content produced by and for the platform.
CCI Score
CCI Score: Apple TV+
-27.93
0.02%
Latest Event
Apple TV+ Champions Black Representation with 'Number One on the Call Sheet'
Apple TV+ released the two-part documentary 'Number One on the Call Sheet', which highlights Black excellence in Hollywood by featuring prominent Black actors and addressing systemic challenges faced by marginalized communities in the industry.
Take Action
So what can you do? It's time to make tough choices. Where will you cast your vote?
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
ACCOMPLICE
Apple TV+ is currently rated as an Accomplice.
Latest Events
- MAR312025
Apple TV+ released the two-part documentary 'Number One on the Call Sheet', which highlights Black excellence in Hollywood by featuring prominent Black actors and addressing systemic challenges faced by marginalized communities in the industry.
- APR252024
Allegations by lawyers representing the Democratic Republic of Congo claim that Apple is sourcing minerals from conflict zones, involving illegal exploitation, child labor, and violence, which contradicts the company's own Conflict Minerals Report.
-80
Supply Chain Ethics
March 31
The article details accusations that Apple is complicit in human rights violations via its supply chain. Specifically, the use of illegally mined minerals linked to violence, child labor, and funding of armed groups represents a clear failure in ethical supply chain management. This raises significant concerns from a human rights and ethical sourcing standpoint, reflecting an authoritarian and exploitative business practice.
- DEC312023
According to OpenSecrets, Apple Inc spent $9.86M on lobbying during 2023, reflecting a significant corporate effort to influence political processes.
-50
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
Apple Inc's reported lobbying expenditure of nearly $10 million in 2023 indicates a deep involvement in shaping public policy. This level of political spending can amplify corporate interests over democratic accountability, reflecting a tendency towards prioritizing business interests in political arenas—a concern from an anti-fascist perspective.
- OCT262023
Apple TV+ has cancelled the upcoming third season of Jon Stewart’s show, a move widely attributed to pressure from Chinese government censorship. Critics argue that this decision prioritizes market access over free expression, effectively silencing a prominent cultural critic.
-80
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
The cancellation appears driven by a desire to avoid offending Chinese authorities, thereby undermining independent political commentary. This decision aligns Apple with authoritarian censorship by prioritizing market access over free speech.
The problem with canceling Jon Stewart: Apple bowed to Chinese government censorship
-60
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 31
In cancelling the show, Apple TV+ demonstrated a business practice that places market considerations above ethical commitments to free expression and diversity of opinion, thus indirectly enabling authoritarian influence.
The problem with canceling Jon Stewart: Apple bowed to Chinese government censorship
-40
Technology and Services Impact
March 31
As a streaming service, Apple TV+ plays a crucial role in shaping cultural narratives. The decision to cancel a show that critiques authoritarian regimes indicates a reluctance to support diverse and challenging content, thereby contributing to a media environment that favors authoritarian interests.
The problem with canceling Jon Stewart: Apple bowed to Chinese government censorship
- JUL152023
A China Labor Watch investigation reveals extensive labor rights violations at Foxconn’s Chengdu factory, one of Apple's major suppliers. The report documents forced overtime, recruitment discrimination, harassment, and exploitation of dispatch workers, raising questions about Apple's oversight of its supply chain.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The investigation details severe labor rights abuses including forced overtime, discriminatory recruitment practices targeting ethnic minorities and pregnant women, and widespread harassment. These violations reflect a significant failure to protect worker rights at a key supplier, implicating Apple's corporate responsibility.
Investigation of an Apple Supplier: Chengdu Foxconn Report in 2023
-70
Supply Chain Ethics
March 31
The report underscores systemic failures in supply chain ethics, as Foxconn's misuse of dispatch labor and non-compliance with legal labor standards indicate Apple’s inability to enforce ethical sourcing practices. This raises concerns about the broader social responsibilities of the company in ensuring safe and fair working conditions.
Investigation of an Apple Supplier: Chengdu Foxconn Report in 2023
- JAN312023
On January 31, 2023, NLRB investigators reported that Apple imposed internal rules restricting workers from discussing wages and other protected activities. The investigation found that such restrictions coerce and intimidate employees, undermining their ability to assert their labor rights.
-75
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The NLRB investigation detailed how Apple’s internal policies, including restrictive confidentiality clauses, impede employees from discussing wages and unionizing. This practice is a significant violation of labor rights and undermines workers' ability to organize, marking a negative step in ethical business practices from an anti-authoritarian perspective.
Apple has infringed on worker rights, NLRB investigators say
- JAN152023
Apple spent $540,000 on lobbying services from Covington & Burling in early January 2023 to convince the White House to veto a patent dispute ruling that threatened an import ban on certain Apple Watch models. The effort ultimately failed, highlighting the company’s use of expensive political influence tactics.
-80
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
Apple’s expenditure of over half a million dollars to influence regulatory decision-making in a patent dispute underscores significant corporate use of political lobbying to protect its interests. This tactic reflects a prioritization of profit over public accountability, contributing negatively to democratic processes.
-70
Executive Political Engagement
March 31
The decision to hire a prominent lobbyist with previous government credentials demonstrates a top-down corporate strategy to sway policy outcomes in its favor. This executive-level political engagement, intended to overturn regulatory decisions, further exemplifies problematic corporate involvement in political processes.
- DEC312022
Apple significantly increased its lobbying spending in 2022 by 44% compared to 2021, reaching nearly $9.4 million. The company engaged on multiple issues, including antitrust, online privacy, taxes, semiconductor policy, content moderation, climate change, immigration, and LGBTQ issues. This aggressive political engagement underscores the firm’s efforts to shape policy debates during a period of potential legislative shifts.
-40
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
The reported increase in lobbying spending is a clear example of corporate political engagement. By significantly ramping up its lobbying efforts, Apple is exerting influence in policymaking. From an anti-authoritarian perspective, such activities risk undermining democratic accountability and can contribute to an environment where corporate interests overly shape policy decisions.
Apple ramped up lobbying spending in 2022, outpacing tech peers
- OCT152022
Apple and its affiliates donated $1.3 million during the 2022 elections cycle, with the majority of funds directed to Democratic candidates. This contribution is interpreted as support for progressive political change in contrast to far‐right authoritarianism.
+60
Political Contributions and Lobbying Efforts
March 31
Apple's political donations, predominantly favoring Democratic candidates (with 88-89% of funds allocated), signal a favoring of progressive, anti-authoritarian policies. This action counters far-right impulses by contributing significantly to parties that generally support worker rights and social justice.
- SEP102020
Apple introduced a new human rights policy updating its supplier code of conduct to ensure fair and ethical workplace standards for workers in its supply chain. The policy sets limits such as a 60-hour workweek and mandates at least one day off, in response to criticisms from human rights groups and recent incidents at supplier factories. However, critics note the move is largely symbolic due to its lack of clear implementation mechanisms and accountability measures.
+30
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
Apple’s announcement of a human rights policy specifically addressing labor conditions marks a positive step towards ensuring safe and respectful workplaces throughout its supply chain. This update in the supplier code of conduct aims to mitigate labor abuses; however, its effectiveness is dampened by the lack of a transparent implementation mechanism, reflecting a cautious yet beneficial move.
+20
Supply Chain Ethics
March 31
The updated supplier code of conduct addresses ethical issues within Apple’s supply chain by setting labor standards; however, the policy is criticized for its lack of binding implementation measures and accountability, suggesting a moderate positive impact on supply chain ethics.
- OCT172019
In October 2019, Apple removed HKmap.live—a tool used by Hong Kong pro-democracy demonstrators—and the Quartz news app from its China App Store. The company justified these removals by citing safety concerns, but critics argue that the removals demonstrate self-censorship and deference to Chinese government demands.
-70
Public and Political Behavior
March 31
Apple’s decision to remove apps that facilitate independent information sharing and support pro-democracy activities suggests a willingness to bow to authoritarian Chinese norms. This action undermines free expression and reinforces self-censorship in politically sensitive regions.
-50
Media Influence and Propaganda
March 31
By removing a news app and a mapping tool vital for protest coordination, Apple limits the flow of independent information. This decision contributes to a media environment that minimizes dissent and aligns with repressive state interests, furthering authoritarian objectives.
- MAR082018
A recent report revealed that labor and human rights violations in Apple's global supply chain have doubled within a year, with cases of working hours falsification, underage labor, and exploitation documented across multiple supplier factories.
-80
Labor Relations and Human Rights Practices
March 31
The report documents a sharp increase in labor violations including working hour falsifications and underage labor, signaling a severe neglect of worker rights in Apple's supply chain.
Apple: Human Rights Violations in Supply Chain Double in a Year, Report Reveals
-75
Supply Chain Ethics
March 31
The doubling of core violations in supplier audits, including exploitation of contract workers and falsified working hours, underscores a systemic failure to enforce ethical supply chain practices.
Apple: Human Rights Violations in Supply Chain Double in a Year, Report Reveals
- JAN012018
Buzzfeed News reported that in 2018 Apple advised Apple TV+ show developers to steer clear of presenting China in a negative light, suggesting that the censorship practiced within China is affecting global content narratives. This directive indicates internal pressure to conform to Chinese state sensitivities even in content intended for international audiences.
-80
Executive Political Engagement
March 31
The directive handed down to Apple TV+ developers to avoid portraying China negatively reflects executive-level political engagement that sacrifices creative freedom for political expediency. This internal censorship serves to align the company's content with authoritarian interests, negatively impacting free expression.
Alternatives

Corporation
-61.24

Burbank, United States
23.52

Seattle, United States
-51.13
Corporation
63.86

New York, USA
33.24

New York, USA
32.54
New York, United States
24.41

Los Angeles, United States
17.94

New York, United States
2.77
Burbank, United States
-8.69
Industries
- 512120
- Motion Picture and Video Distribution
- 515210
- Cable and Other Subscription Programming
- 515111
- Broadcasting (except Internet)