Company Directory - American Redistricting Project
Company Details - American Redistricting Project
American Redistricting Project
WebsiteAn initiative aimed at educating and empowering citizens about the redistricting process across the United States.
CCI Score
CCI Score: American Redistricting Project
12.50
-0.01%
Latest Event
Empowering Citizens Through Transparent Redistricting
American Redistricting Project uses its platform to educate citizens about fair redistricting and the implications of partisan gerrymandering, countering undemocratic practices and supporting equitable electoral processes.
Take Action
So what can you do? Support by shopping, spreading the word, or offering your support.
- Shop Alternatives
SEE ALL - Use Your Voice
OTHER TOOLS - Investigate
- Share the Score
SUPPORT CCI
SABOTEUR
American Redistricting Project is currently rated as a Saboteur.
Latest Events
- JAN272025
American Redistricting Project uses its platform to educate citizens about fair redistricting and the implications of partisan gerrymandering, countering undemocratic practices and supporting equitable electoral processes.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The American Redistricting Project bolsters democratic values by providing transparency on redistricting practices, helping citizens understand and challenge undemocratic, gerrymandered maps that can favor authoritarian outcomes. Their educational efforts promote political engagement and fairness, which is a strong counter to fascist and authoritarian tendencies in electoral processes.
- AUG232021
A landmark settlement in Nassau County established fair voting maps that dismantle partisan gerrymandering, ensuring equitable representation for Black, Latino, and Asian communities. This outcome aligns with the mission of the American Redistricting Project to educate and empower citizens in the redistricting process and safeguard democratic values.
+80
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The settlement advances democratic participation by countering systemic gerrymandering that dilutes minority votes. This action supports fair political representation and resists authoritarian tactics that undermine the electoral process, reflecting a strong commitment to public and political engagement.
+75
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 22
The American Redistricting Project’s emphasis on educating citizens about the redistricting process underscores its commitment to ethical practices and fairness in public policy. By promoting transparent and equitable redistricting methods, the organization upholds principles of accountability and democratic integrity.
- MAY202021
The American Redistricting Project, originally established as a right‐leaning hub, appears intricately linked to dark money and partisan manipulation in redistricting processes. Its formation involved funding channels lacking full transparency, raising concerns about its role in skewing democratic practices and potentially bolstering authoritarian outcomes.
-60
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The project’s design as a right‐leaning informational hub appears tied to dark money influences that can undermine electoral transparency and fairness. This direct involvement in political messaging and partisan redistricting contributes to a political environment that risks supporting authoritarian manipulation.
How ‘dark money’ is shaping redistricting in 2021 • OpenSecrets
-20
Business Practices and Ethical Responsibility
March 22
The funding and operational practices behind the establishment of the American Redistricting Project reveal a reliance on opaque financial sources. This lack of transparent ethical business practices raises concerns about the integrity of its mission and the potential for furthering partisan agendas that may contribute indirectly to authoritarian practices.
How ‘dark money’ is shaping redistricting in 2021 • OpenSecrets
- JUN012020
The American Redistricting Project, funded by the Fair Lines Foundation and closely connected to GOP redistricting initiatives, launched a website to aggregate redistricting data. The project also moved to form its own PAC via WinRed, a move that raises concerns about partisan manipulation designed to influence electoral outcomes and undermine fair democratic processes.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The launch of the redistricting platform by a GOP-backed group, along with plans to form a political action committee to mobilize small-dollar donations, reflects a strategic use of public political behavior to shape electoral maps. Such maneuvers are seen as efforts to consolidate partisan power and potentially pave the way for authoritarian practices by undermining fair democratic representation.
- JUN012020
The American Redistricting Project, despite its nonpartisan branding, is funded by GOP-aligned groups and backed by figures like Adam Kincaid. The initiative aims to provide redistricting news and data, aligning with partisan redistricting strategies that could entrench conservative power and undermine democratic checks.
-40
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The project's backing by GOP entities and its role in consolidating conservative redistricting strategies raise concerns from an anti-fascist perspective. By potentially manipulating electoral boundaries, the initiative reinforces partisan power structures that can erode democratic norms and contribute indirectly to authoritarian practices.
- JUL092010
The American Redistricting Project has released a comprehensive guide on redistricting aimed at empowering communities, enhancing minority voting rights, and ensuring that electoral boundaries reflect fair, inclusive, and democratically sound practices. This initiative supports resistance to discriminatory redistricting and combats practices that could undermine democratic participation.
+90
Public and Political Behavior
March 22
The project promotes transparent political engagement and empowers citizens by providing critical information on redistricting, ensuring fair representation and defending minority voting rights. This is a proactive effort to counteract gerrymandering and authoritarian practices that dilute democratic participation.
Alternatives
Washington, D.C., United States
-33.41
Tokyo, Japan
-41.93
Corporation
77.10
Corporation
61.26
Corporation
59.17
Corporation
0.00
Toronto, Canada
20.31
Corporation
51.52
Kyiv, Ukraine
41.38
Boston, United States
31.33
Industries
- 541611
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- 541620
- Environmental Consulting Services
- 541990
- All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services