The article reports that officials in the Trump administration have recently expressed support for Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) after German intelligence services labeled the party as a 'proven right‐wing extremist organization'. This endorsement has stirred controversy and provoked strong reactions from German political figures, including Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who cautioned against U.S. involvement. The classification review of AfD is currently on hold amid ongoing legal challenges.

Germany's domestic intelligence agency has classified the far-right AfD as a right-wing extremist group due to its anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric. The move, which paves the way for increased surveillance and possible political exclusion, has been criticized by AfD leaders as an attack on democracy.

German domestic intelligence (BfV) has declared the AfD as a 'proven right-wing extremist endeavor' incompatible with a free democratic order. This designation stems from the party's exclusionary policies and extremist rhetoric, such as advocating for large-scale deportations and denying equal citizenship to migrants. The decision, following a comprehensive audit, entails increased surveillance measures and has been met with strong denunciation by AfD leaders, who claim political bias ahead of a government transition.

German intelligence agencies have classified the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) as a right-wing extremist organization due to its well-documented xenophobic, anti-minority, and anti-democratic rhetoric. The designation, announced on May 2, 2025, paves the way for intensified surveillance and potential discussions on banning the party, highlighting its alignment with extremist ideologies.

German authorities have formally classified Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) as a right-wing extremist organization, a designation that enables intensified surveillance and signals deep-rooted far-right, anti-democratic tendencies. Party leaders responded by condemning the decision as a politically motivated attack on democracy.

German domestic intelligence (BfV) classified the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party as a right-wing extremist group due to its repeated anti-democratic, xenophobic, and Islamophobic rhetoric, marking it as a threat to Germany's free democratic order.

German intelligence has officially designated the AfD as a right-wing extremist party. This classification, which may lead to increased surveillance and potential banning proceedings, confirms longstanding concerns about the party’s extremist and authoritarian ideology.

An Austrian investigation has been launched into a record campaign donation of 2.35 million euros to Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), significantly boosting the far‐right party in the final stretch of the election campaign. The donation, reportedly received in early February 2025, raises concerns about external funding influencing far‐right policies.

On February 1, 2025, the AfD received a record donation of €2.35 million from Gerhard Dingler, with allegations that the funds were funneled through him by billionaire Henning Conle, potentially constituting illegal party financing and exposing the party to fines of up to €7 million. This follows previous controversies involving similar donations and raises serious questions about the party's financial practices and alignment with authoritarian methods.

Friedrich Merz, leader of Germany's CDU, declared that his party would not cooperate with the far-right AfD, stating that such an alliance would be tantamount to 'selling the party's soul.' This refusal highlights the growing political isolation of the party due to its extremist, anti-immigrant stance.

Germany’s domestic intelligence agency (BfV) has concluded that three organizations connected to the AfD – including its youth wing, the Institute for State Politics, and the group One Percent – harbor extremist goals that breach the constitution, prompting enhanced surveillance.

Germany’s AfD was hit with substantial fines following a donations scandal involving alleged illegal campaign contributions from a Swiss company, with fines amounting to three times the value of the free advertising. The party's response claims political motivation while investigations continue, raising concerns about its compliance with campaign finance laws.