A group of diverse people holding shopping bags.

Vote with Your Wallet

Empowering informed consumer choices to keep your money out of the hands of fascits and authoritarians.

Browse Companies

Fascism Resurgent

Recognize the signs and learn how to fight back.

Read Opinion

Ranking Complicity

Learn how we evaluate corporate actions and values.

See Algorithm

The CCI Rating System

In order to make it easier to group and quickly understand a company's rating, we segment companies into categories. These categories represent the overall influence of a company's Corporate Complicity Index score. Learn more about the algorithm.

← SCROLL →

100

-10

-20

-30

-40

-50

-60

-70

-80

-90

-100

+45 to +100

Companies in this range actively lead the fight against authoritarianism by rejecting oppressive practices and championing democratic values. They implement robust policies, engage in transparent governance, and drive initiatives that set the standard for corporate responsibility.

+25 to +44

These companies are vocal in their opposition to authoritarian regimes. They publicly criticize oppressive policies and engage in advocacy efforts to promote accountability and transparency, even if their actions aren’t as extensive as those of Moral Leaders.

+10 to +24

Companies in this bracket take more subtle actions to undermine authoritarian practices. They might implement internal policies or support reforms that quietly weaken oppressive systems, contributing to change in less overt ways.

0 to +9

These companies deliberately avoid direct involvement with authoritarian practices. While they do not actively challenge oppressive regimes, they maintain a neutral stance to ensure they are not complicit in supporting such systems.

-1 to -4

Companies scoring here do little to oppose authoritarianism. Their inaction results in a passive endorsement of the status quo, as they neither actively resist oppression nor contribute to overt support for it.

-5 to -9

In this category, companies align with authoritarian practices mainly to avoid trouble or regulatory conflict. Their compliance is driven by self-preservation, resulting in minimal resistance even as they participate in oppressive systems.

-10 to -19

Companies in this segment facilitate authoritarian practices while claiming neutrality. They provide resources or support that indirectly bolster oppressive regimes, thereby undermining democratic accountability without overtly endorsing the regime.

-20 to -29

These companies profit from authoritarian practices through their business dealings. Although they may not be directly enforcing oppressive policies, their actions contribute to the economic and operational sustenance of authoritarian regimes.

-30 to -44

Companies scoring in this range actively seek to please authoritarian regimes. They offer proactive support and assistance in exchange for preferential treatment, compromising ethical standards for business gains and political favor.

-44 to -59

These companies are fully aligned with authoritarian regimes. They not only support but also enforce oppressive policies, playing a significant role in the regime’s operational apparatus and contributing directly to its consolidation of power.

-60 to -100

Companies in this category are instrumental in designing and executing authoritarian rule. They actively create and implement frameworks that sustain oppressive policies, wielding considerable influence in shaping autocratic systems.

Vote with Your Wallet

Fascism Resurgent

Ranking Complicity

Food Service and Drinking Places

Spectator Sports